Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 308-317, February 2005

Artisan iris-claw phakic intraocular lens followed by laser in situ keratomileusis for high hyperopia

From the Refractive Surgery Department, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain

Accepted 21 May 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of high hyperopia.

Setting

Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Methods

This prospective trial included 39 eyes with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of 7.39 diopters (D) ± 1.30 (SD) and a cylinder between 0 and −4.25 D. The Artisan iris-fixated phakic IOL (Ophtec) for hyperopia was implanted, and LASIK was performed 6 to 8 months later. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, endothelial cell loss (ECL), endothelium morphologic analysis, and patient satisfaction were recorded. The minimum follow-up was 12 months.

Results

At 1 year, 37 eyes (94.9%) were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia and 31 eyes (79.5%) were within ±0.50 D. Thirty-five eyes (89.7%) achieved a UCVA of 0.5 or better. There was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA after phakic IOL implantation, but this effect was corrected after LASIK. Nine eyes (23.1%) lost 1 line of BCVA; 7 eyes (17.9%) gained at least 1 line. One eye (2.6%) showed a change in SE greater than 1.0 D over the follow-up period. The mean ECL was 10.9%, but morphologic analysis suggested no additional damage caused by LASIK over that produced by phakic IOL surgery. Overall patient satisfaction was high.

Conclusions

The combination of Artisan phakic IOL implantation and LASIK safely, predictably, and effectively reduced high hyperopia. A loss of 1 line of BCVA should be expected in about one third of eyes implanted with this IOL. Halos and glare at night remain a potential problem.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any product mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00694-7

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.056

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 308-317, February 2005