Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 562-570, March 2005

Intraocular lens calculations after refractive surgery

From Laser and Corneal Surgery Associates, PC (Latkany, Chokshi, Speaker, Abramson) and the Departments of Ophthalmology (Latkany, Chokshi, Speaker, Abramson, Soloway) and Otolaryngology, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Service (Yu), New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York, USA

Accepted 23 June 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of refractive surgery on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, compare methods of IOL power calculation after refractive surgery, evaluate the effect of pre-refractive surgery refractive error on IOL deviation, review the literature on determining IOL power after refractive surgery, and introduce a formula for IOL calculation for use after refractive surgery for myopia.

Setting

Laser & Corneal Surgery Associates and Center for Ocular Tear Film Disorders, New York, New York, USA.

Methods

This retrospective noncomparative case series comprised 21 patients who had uneventful cataract extraction and IOL implantation after previous uneventful myopic refractive surgery. Six methods of IOL calculation were used: clinical history (IOLHisK), clinical history at the spectacle plane (IOLHisKs), vertex (IOLvertex), back-calculated (IOLBC), calculation based on average keratometry (IOLavgK), and calculation based on flattest keratometry (IOLflatK). Each method result was compared to an “exact” IOL (IOLexact) that would have resulted in emmetropia and then compared to the pre-refractive surgery manifest refraction using linear regression. The paired t test was used to determine statistical significance.

Results

The IOLHisKs was the most accurate method for IOL calculations, with a mean deviation from emmetropia of −0.56 diopter ±1.59 (D), followed by the IOLBC (+1.06 ± 1.51 D), IOLvertex (+1.51 ± 1.95 D), IOLflatK (−1.72 ± 2.19 D), IOLHisK (−1.76 ± 1.76 D), and IOLavgK (−2.32 ± 2.36 D). There was no statistical difference between IOLHisKs and IOLexact in myopic eyes. The power of IOLflatK would be inaccurate by −(0.47x+0.85), where x is the pre-refractive surgery myopic SE (SEQm). Thus, without adjusting IOLflatK, most patients would be left hyperopic. However, when IOLflatK is adjusted with this formula, it would not be statistically different from IOLexact.

Conclusions

For IOL power selection in previously myopic patients, a predictive formula to calculate IOL power based only on the pre-refractive surgery SEQm and current flattest keratometry readings was not statistically different from IOLexact. The IOLHisKs, which was also not statistically different from IOLexact, requires pre-refractive surgery keratometry readings that are often not available to the cataract surgeon.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Latkany has filed a patent application for the formula described. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00716-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.053

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 562-570, March 2005