Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 511-524, March 2005

Traumatic cataract and other adverse events with the implantable contact lens

From Helsinki University Eye Hospital (Sarikkola, Uusitalo), Helsinki, Finland, and Uveitis and Ocular Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (Sen), Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Accepted 18 June 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate the surgical outcome and adverse events associated with implantation of the implantable contact lens (ICL) for the correction of high myopia or high hyperopia.

Setting

Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Methods

In this nonrandomized prospective clinical trial, the ICL V4 was implanted in 26 eyes of 13 patients with normal enrollment criteria (younger than 45 years, a clinically clear crystalline lens) (Group 1) and the V2, V3, or V4 were implanted in 38 eyes of 22 patients with heterogeneous criteria (older than 45 years or opacities in the crystalline lens) (Group 2). The main outcome measures were lens opacity classification system (LOCS II) assessment and transparency analysis of the lens.

Results

In Group 1, microdensitometric assessment showed no decrease in crystalline lens transparency and no statistically significant increase in crystalline lens density at any follow-up examination (P>.05). The incidence of anterior subcapsular (AS) opacities was 7.7%, and no eye developed clinically significant cataract during the mean follow-up of 13.2 months ± 12.3 (SD). No myopic eye lost a line of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); 50.0% of hyperopic eyes lost 1 line of BCVA. Sixty-eight percent of myopic eyes and 75.0% of hyperopic eyes were within ±1.0 diopter of the predicted refraction. In Group 2, the incidence of AS opacities was 47.4% and 10 eyes (26.3%) developed clinically significant cataract during the mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 18.0 months. The visual and refractive results were similar to those in Group 1 at 1 month, but due to progressive AS opacities in the crystalline lens, 23.4% of eyes lost BCVA lines during the follow-up. Intraoperative complications were few and insignificant.

Conclusions

Implantation of the ICL for correction of high myopia or high hyperopia appears to be a safe procedure with good visual and refractive results immediately. There was no decrease in the transparency or increase in the density of the crystalline lens with the latest generation of the ICL device in the normal group, indicating enhanced safety. Progressive lens opacification in the heterogeneous group shows there are risk factors for cataract formation; ie, type V3 ICL, preexisting lens opacities, and older patient age. Anterior subcapsular opacities are most likely the result of trauma.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a special government grant for research (TYH 3234), Helsinki University Eye Hospital, a grant from the Finnish Eye Foundation, and a grant from the Evald and Hilda Nissi Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.Presented in part at the XXIst Congress of the European Congress of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, Munich, Germany, September 2003.None of the authors has a financial interest in any product mentioned.Timo Pessi, MSc, provided consultation on the statistical analysis, and Tuula Tuulenmäki aided in collecting and recording the data.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00881-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.084

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 511-524, March 2005