Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 48-60, January 2005

Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

From Pepose Vision Institute (Qazi, Pepose) and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine (Qazi, Pepose), St. Louis, Missouri, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering Center, The Ohio State University (Roberts, Mahmoud), Columbus, Ohio, USA

Accepted 5 November 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate the size, shape, and uniformity of the videokeratographic functional optical zone (FOZ) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in 2 cohorts of patients with equivalent amounts of preoperative myopic or hyperopic astigmatism.

Setting

Pepose Vision Institute, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Methods

Eyes with myopic or hyperopic astigmatism (n=27 in each group) that had LASIK with the Visx Star S3 laser were retrospectively selected to match for level of preoperative refractive error. Slit-scanning videokeratography was performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively and analyzed using custom software. The FOZ was calculated by analyzing refractive power maps using a region-growing algorithm. Difference maps were generated from slit images and compared for interval change in corneal elevation, tangential curvature, and refractive power. The difference maps were also averaged (mean difference maps) for each target population. A Zernike decomposition of corneal first-surface elevation was performed to compare postoperative values with baseline parameters.

Results

The mean postoperative refractive sphere at 6 months was −0.17 diopter (D) ± 0.66 (SD) and +0.25 ± 0.85 D in the myopia group and hyperopia group, respectively, and the mean postoperative astigmatism, −0.49 ± 0.32 D and −0.65 ± 0.52 D, respectively (P=.11). Based on the refractive power maps, the mean preoperative and postoperative myopic FOZ was 33.09 ± 7.30 mm2 and 30.94 ± 5.43 mm2, respectively, and the mean hyperopic FOZ, 33.19 ± 7.96 mm2 and 37.99 ± 6.88 mm2, respectively. After LASIK, there was an increase in magnitude of negative anterior corneal surface spherical-like Zernike values in the myopia group (P<.0001) and an increase in magnitude of positive spherical-like Zernike values in the hyperopia group. Postoperatively, significant induction of corneal surface horizontal coma was noted in hyperopic eyes (P<.0001). Hyperopic eyes, on average, had larger topographic FOZs after LASIK, but with less uniformity of curvature and power change than myopic eyes.

Conclusions

Hyperopic LASIK, which involves more transition points along the ablation diameter, produced a less uniform topographic FOZ than typical myopic treatments. Less predictable biomechanical changes from the circumferential release of tension on collagen bundles after midperipheral hyperopic ablation and greater variation in beam centration and the angle of incidence may contribute to the greater variability in corneal curvature and power in hyperopic LASIK than in myopic LASIK.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the 7th European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons Winter Refractive Surgery Meeting, Rome, Italy, February 2003.Supported in part by the Midwest Cornea Research Foundation, St. Louis, Missouri, and the Central Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation, Columbus, Ohio, USA.Dr. Roberts is a consultant to Bausch & Lomb. Drs. Roberts and Mahmoud have a financial interest in the OSU CTT.None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(04)01064-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.043

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 48-60, January 2005