Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 7 , Pages 1357-1365, July 2005

Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: Analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes

From the Clínica Baviera, Instituto Oftalmológico Europeo, Madrid, Spain

Accepted 22 December 2004.

Purpose

To analyze refractive, visual, and contrast sensitivity outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed under thin flaps (less than 100 μm), and compare them with those of conventional thicker flaps.

Setting

Clínica Baviera, Instituto Oftalmológico Europeo, Madrid, Spain.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised 280 consecutive eyes that had LASIK for myopia using the Moria LSK-One microkeratome and the Technolas 217C excimer laser. Efficacy, predictability, and contrast sensitivity indicators were compared between 3 groups of flap thickness: thin (<100 μm, n=105), medium (100 to 129 μm, n=122), and thick (>130 μm, n=53).

Results

Refractive results were excellent and comparable between the 3 groups; however, visual outcomes—measured as efficacy, postoperative evolution of uncorrected visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity—test were significantly better in the thin flap group. Efficacy results were 92.9%, 91.0%, and 81.0% in the thin, medium, and thick flap groups, respectively (P<.05), and the rate of enhancements was 0%, 2.3%, and 5.6%, respectively. With regard to contrast sensitivity, changes between preoperative and postoperative values at month 3 of follow-up, the thin flap group achieved the preoperative levels at 3 spatial frequencies (3, 6, and 18 cycles per degree), while the thicker flap groups maintained lower than preoperative levels at more than 2 spatial frequencies. When comparing contrast sensitivity values between the 3 groups, the thin flap group also obtained the best results at lower spatial frequencies.

Conclusions

Thin flap LASIK is a safe technique to correct myopic defects since it blends the advantages of surface and lamellar procedures (minimal debilitation of corneal biomechanical architecture with the rapid and comfortable visual recovery of lamellar approaches). Moreover, it achieves excellent refractive outcomes, a lower rate of enhancements, and a good visual performance with better contrast sensitivity test results.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Dr. Jose L. Ramos, Clínica Baviera–Málaga, provided the corneal ectasia data and Thomas O'Boyle, assistance with English.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00079-9

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.058

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 7 , Pages 1357-1365, July 2005