Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 1537-1543, August 2005

Changes in quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

From the Department of Optometry (Garamendi, Elliot), University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, and the University of Houston College of Optometry (Pesudovs), Houston, Texas, USA

Accepted 22 December 2004.

Purpose

To measure quality of life (QoL) outcome in prepresbyopic myopic patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) refractive surgery using the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire and to compare the QoL of preoperative patients with a sample of spectacle and contact lens wearers not considering refractive surgery.

Setting

Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, and Ultralase, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

Methods

The validated QIRC questionnaire was prospectively completed by 66 patients before and 3 months after LASIK. Patients had myopia greater than 0.50 diopters (D) (range −0.75 to −10.50 D) and were aged 16 to 39 years. Patients were also directly asked to evaluate their QoL after surgery.

Results

Overall QIRC scores improved after LASIK from a mean of 40.07 ± 4.30 (SD) to 53.09 ± 5.25 (F1,130=172.65, P<.001). Greater improvements occurred in women (53.83 ± 5.46) than in men (49.39 ± 5.94; F1,64=9.37, P<.005). Overall, 15 of the 20 questions (especially convenience, health concerns, and well-being questions) showed significantly improved scores (P<.05). Patients who “strongly agreed” (53.96 ± 4.91, n=33) or “agreed” (51.78 ± 6.19, n=23) had improved QoL and had significantly higher QIRC scores than those who “neither agreed nor disagreed” (44.36 ± 4.97, n=5) or “strongly disagreed” (42.82, n=1) (F1,60=11.24, P<.001). The matched group not contemplating LASIK scored 42.41 ± 3.89 on QIRC overall.

Conclusions

Large improvements in QIRC QoL scores were found after LASIK for myopia in the majority of patients, with greater improvements in women. A small number of patients (4.5%) had decreased QIRC QoL scores, and these were associated with complications. People presenting for LASIK scored measurably poorer than matched patients not contemplating refractive surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Association for Vision Research in Ophthalmology annual meeting, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 2004.Supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Sir Neil Hamilton Fairley Fellowship 0061.Dr. Pesudovs is a consultant to Ultralase. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any method or material mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00080-5

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.059

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 1537-1543, August 2005