Journal Home
Search for

Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 2101-2103 (November 2005)


View previous. 34 of 60 View next.

Refractive results with secondary piggyback implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive errors

Zohar Habot-Wilner, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Dan Sachs, MD, Michael Cahane, MD, Amir Alhalel, MD, Howard Desatnik, MD, Emanuel Schwalb, MD, Irina S. Barequet, MD

Accepted 11 January 2005.

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and safety of implanting a second intraocular lens (IOL) to correct pseudophakic refractive errors.

Setting

Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Methods

This prospective noncomparative case series included 10 pseudophakic eyes, 5 with a myopic residual refractive error and 5 with a hyperopic residual refractive error. All eyes had secondary piggyback IOL implantation with the IOL placed in the ciliary sulcus. Five types of IOLs were used to correct the residual refractive error.

Results

The mean preoperative myopia was −6.6 diopters ± 3.3 (SD), and the refractive outcome was within 0.5 ± 0.7 D of the desired refraction (range –1.5 [undercorrected] and +1.0 D [overcorrected]). The mean preoperative hyperopia was +3.8 ± 0.8 D, and the refractive outcome was within 0.46 ± 0.4 D of the desired refraction (range 0 and 1.0 D overcorrected). All patients showed visual acuity improvement. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved from 20/44 to 20/30 (P<.05).

Conclusion

An IOL type that is appropriate for implantation in the ciliary sulcus is a viable option for correcting pseudophakic refractive error using the piggyback technique.

From the Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Zohar Habot-Wilner, MD, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, 52061 Tel Hashomer, Israel.

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00382-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.05.023


View previous. 34 of 60 View next.