Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 10 , Pages 1701-1707, October 2007

Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia

  • Hassan Hashemi, MD
  • ,
  • Shiva Mehravaran, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Shiva Mehravaran, MD, Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Number 106 Esfandiar Boulevard, Vali'asr Avenue, Tehran, 19686-53111, Iran.

From the Farabi Eye Hospital (Hashemi), Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and the Noor Ophthalmology Research Center (Hashemi, Mehravaran), Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Accepted 30 May 2007.

Purpose

To determine the agreement in central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements between the gold standard method of ultrasound (US) pachymetry (UP-1000, Nidek) and 2 noncontact systems based on Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam, Oculus) and scanning-slit topography (Orbscan II, Bausch & Lomb) in myopic eyes before and after laser refractive surgery.

Setting

Noor Vision Correction Center, Tehran, Iran.

Methods

In this prospective study, 30 consecutive patients having refractive surgery for myopia were enrolled. All 60 eyes were examined with the 3 devices preoperatively and 6 weeks after surgery; the US measurements were performed last. The Pentacam and Orbscan II CCT readings were compared with the US readings. Both the original and corrected Orbscan II readings were used in the analyses.

Results

The mean CCT readings with US, Pentacam, and Orbscan II were, respectively, 555 μm, 548 μm, and 580 μm before surgery and 478 μm, 468 μm, and 474 μm after surgery. Preoperatively, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) with US were −31 μm and +19 μm for the Pentacam device and −5 μm and +57 μm for the Orbscan II device. Postoperatively, the LoA were −40 μm and +19 μm and −51 μm and +50 μm, respectively. Corrected Orbscan II measurements gave 95% LoA of −48 μm and +6 μm before surgery and −85 μm and +5 μm after surgery.

Conclusions

Refractive surgery had a modest effect on the agreement between Pentacam readings and US measurements. With Orbscan II, the 95% LoA width nearly doubled after surgery. Although the Pentacam seems to show better agreement than Orbscan II, especially after refractive surgery, it is not advisable to use the 3 devices interchangeably in every clinical situation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented at the XXIV Congress of the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, London, United Kingdom, September 2006.

PII: S0886-3350(07)01186-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.040

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 10 , Pages 1701-1707, October 2007