Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 930-934, May 2003

Posterior vitreous detachment after neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy

  • Richard M Sheard, MA, FRCOphth

      Affiliations

    • Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology (Sheard, Comer, Scott, Snead), Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Sandy F Goodburn, PhD, BSc, SRN, SCM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Genetics (Goodburn), Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Marie B Comer, MRCP, FRCOphth

      Affiliations

    • Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology (Sheard, Comer, Scott, Snead), Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • John D Scott, MA, FRCS, FRCOphth

      Affiliations

    • Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology (Sheard, Comer, Scott, Snead), Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Martin P Snead, MD, FRCS, FRCOphth

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Mr. M.P. Snead, Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom.
    • None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
    • Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology (Sheard, Comer, Scott, Snead), Cambridge, United Kingdom

Accepted 12 September 2002.

Abstract 

Purpose

To determine whether retinal detachment (RD) after neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy is due to a greater incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) than in controls and whether vitreous status at the time of capsulotomy is useful in predicting the risk for RD.

Setting

Teaching hospital ophthalmology service.

Methods

Patients having Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy after uneventful cataract surgery (treatment group) were prospectively studied. Fellow eyes that had extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation but no Nd:YAG capsulotomy (no-laser group) formed 1 control group, and eyes that had no cataract surgery (phakic group) formed a second control group. The treatment group comprised 322 eyes; the no-laser group, 97; and the phakic group, 142. Dilated fundus and vitreous examinations were performed at baseline (before Nd:YAG capsulotomy) and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

At baseline, the prevalence of PVD was similar in the treatment and no-laser groups (61.8% and 63.9%, respectively; P=.2014) but was significantly lower in the phakic group (50.7%; P=.0151). There was no significant difference among the groups in the development of PVD in eyes with attached vitreous at baseline (17.9%, treatment group; 11.4%, no-laser group; 17.1%, phakic group) (P=.6588).

Conclusions

The prevalence of PVD was significantly higher in eyes after ECCE and IOL implantation than in phakic eyes independent of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Capsulotomy was not associated with a significantly higher incidence of new PVD; therefore, the presence or absence of PVD at the time of capsulotomy is not helpful in assessing the risk for RD in the first year after laser treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0886-3350(02)01837-0

doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01837-0

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 930-934, May 2003