Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 941-948 , May 2003

Impact of cataract surgery on self-reported visual difficulties: Comparison with a no-surgery reference group

  • Gerald McGwin Jr., MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (McGwin, Scilley, Brown, Owsley), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health (McGwin), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Section on Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine (McGwin), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Gerald McGwin, MS, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Callahan Eye Foundation Hospital, 700 South 18th Street, Suite 609, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0009, USA.
  • ,
  • Kay Scilley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (McGwin, Scilley, Brown, Owsley), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Dr. Owsley is a Research to Prevent Blindness senior scientific investigator. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
  • ,
  • Jay Brown, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (McGwin, Scilley, Brown, Owsley), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Dr. Owsley is a Research to Prevent Blindness senior scientific investigator. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
  • ,
  • Cynthia Owsley, PhD, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (McGwin, Scilley, Brown, Owsley), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    • Dr. Owsley is a Research to Prevent Blindness senior scientific investigator. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

,Accepted 18 September 2002.

References 

  1. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, et al.  The Framingham Eye Study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:17–32
  2. Klein BEK, Klein R, Linton KLP. Prevalence of age-related lens opacities in a population; the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:546–552
  3. Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ. Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:56–61
  4. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1496–1504
  5. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1050–1058
  6. Owsley C, Stalvey B, Wells J, Sloane ME. Older drivers and cataract (driving habits and crash risk). J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci. 1999;54A:M203–M211
  7. Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, Sharkey PD, et al.  The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1041–1049
  8. Bernth-Petersen P. Outcome of cataract surgery I. A prospective, observational study. Acta Ophthalmol. 1982;60:235–242
  9. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Elam JT, et al.  Impact of cataract surgery with lens implantation on vision and physical function in elderly patients. JAMA. 1987;257:1064–1066
  10. Brenner MH, Curbow B, Javitt JC, et al.  Vision change and quality of life in the elderly; response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:680–685
  11. Javitt JC, Brenner MH, Curbow B, et al.  Outcomes of cataract surgery; improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function after surgery in the first, second, and both eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:686–691
  12. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al.  Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1419–1425
  13. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al.  National study of cataract surgery outcomes (variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures). Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1131–1140

    ; discussion by DM O’Day, 1140–1141

  14. Javitt JC, Steinberg EP, Sharkey P, et al.  Cataract surgery in one eye or both; a billion dollar per year issue. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1583–1592

    ; discussion by DM O’Day, 1592–1593

  15. Elliott DB, Patla A, Bullimore MA. Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:889–895
  16. Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Wells J, et al.  Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:881–887
  17. Owsley C, McGwin GJ, Sloane M, et al.  Impact of cataract surgery on motor vehicle crash involvement by older adults. JAMA. 2002;288:841–849
  18. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al.  Development of the “Activities of Daily Vision Scale”; a measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30:1111–1126
  19. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:91–96
  20. Ferris FL, Sperduto RD. Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:97–98
  21. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2:187–199
  22. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL. Improving the reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. Clin Vis Sci. 1991;6:471–475
  23. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Trujillo J, Ruiz RS. Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987;13:67–69
  24. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:108–119
  25. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes (analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements). BMJ. 2001;323:1123–1124
  26. Broman AT, Munoz B, Rodriguez J, et al.  Factors associated with accessing cataract surgery in a population-based study of Hispanics (Proyecto VER. ARVO abstract 2869). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(4):S534
  27. Lee P. Assessing quality and utilization patterns in health care delivery systems. [editorial] Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:234–235
  28. Jette AM, Branch LG. A ten-year follow-up of driving patterns among the community-dwelling elderly. Hum Factors. 1992;34:25–31
  29. Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, et al.  Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1543–1547
  30. Rubin GS, Bandeen Roche K, Prasada-Rao P, Fried LP. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:750–760
  31. Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang G-H, et al.  The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability (SEE Project). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:64–72
  32. Sloane ME, Ball K, Owsley C, et al. The Visual Activities Questionnaire: developing an instrument for assessing problems in everyday visual tasks. In: Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System Technical Digest. Washington, DC, Optical Society of America, 1992; 1:26-29
  33. Scilley K, Jackson GR, Cideciyan AV, et al.  Early age-related maculopathy and self-reported visual difficulty in daily life. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1235–1242
  34. Owsley C, McGwin G, Sloane ME, et al.  Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks (relationship to visual function in older adults). Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:350–359
  35. Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1059–1067

 Funded by the National Institutes of Health grant P50 AG11684, Bethesda, Maryland, Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, and EyeSight Foundation of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

PII: S0886-3350(02)01846-1

doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01846-1

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 941-948 , May 2003