Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 1300-1309 , June 2004

Quality assessment model of 3 different microkeratomes through confocal microscopy

  • Jaime Javaloy Estañ, MD,PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Jaime Javaloy Estañ, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Avda Denia, 111, Alicante, Spain.
  • ,
  • Marı́a T Vidal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Antonio Quinto, OA

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Miguel Hernández University, the Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Victoria de Rojas, MD,PhD

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Gallego de Oftalmologı́a, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain
  • ,
  • Jorge L Alió, MD,PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Alicante, Spain

,Accepted 23 October 2003.

References 

  1. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism (safety and efficacy. (Opthalmic Technologies Assessment) A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology). Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–187
  2. Walker MB, Wilson SE. Lower intraoperative flap complication rate with the Hansatome microkeratome compared to the Automated Corneal Shaper. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:79–82
  3. Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ. Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:23–28
  4. Knorz MC. Flap and interface complications in LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:242–245
  5. Yildirim R, Devranoglu K, Ozdamar A, et al.  Flap complications in our learning curve of laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2001;11:328–332
  6. Kuo IC, Ou R, Hwang DG. Flap haze after epithelial debridement and flap hydration for treatment of post-laser in situ keratomileusis striae. Cornea. 2001;20:339–341
  7. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1796–1802
  8. Carlson KH, Carpel EF. Epithelial folds following slippage of LASIK flap. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000;31:435–437
  9. Pallikaris IG, Katsanevaki VJ, Panagopoulou SI. Laser in situ keratomileusis intraoperative complications using one type of microkeratome. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:57–63
  10. Buratto L, Brint S. LASIK with a nasal hinge using the ACS microkeratome. In:  Buratto L,  Brint S editor. LASIK; Surgical Techniques and Complications. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2000;p. 103–129
  11. Hamill MB, Kohnen T. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the surface characteristics of 4 microkeratome systems in human corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:328–336
  12. Shemesh G, Dotan G, Lipshitz I. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S341–S347
  13. Gokmen F, Jester JV, Petroll WM, et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy through-focusing to measure corneal flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:962–970
  14. Tole DM, McCarty DJ, Couper T, Taylor HR. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of −6.00 diopters or less; the Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:46–54
  15. Lyle WA, Jin GJC. Results of flap repositioning after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1451–1457
  16. Booranapong W, Malathum P, Slade SG. Anatomic factors affecting microkeratome placement in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1319–1325
  17. Vesaluoma M, Pérez Santonja J, Petroll M, et al.  Corneal stromal changes induced by myopic LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:369–376 erratum, 2027
  18. Behrens A, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, et al.  Experimental evaluation of two current-generation automated microkeratomes (the Hansatome and the Supratome). Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:59–67
  19. Yildirim R, Aras C, Ozdamar A, et al.  Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1729–1732
  20. Gailitis RP, Lagzdins M. Factors that affect corneal flap thickness with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:439–443
  21. Spadea L, Cerrone L, Necozione S, Balestrazzi E. Flap measurements with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:149–154
  22. Wilhelm F, Giesmann T, Hanschke R, Duncker G. Schnittkanten nach lamellärer Keratotomie mit verschiedenen Mikrokeratomen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1998;213:293–300
  23. Wilhelm FW, Giessmann T, Hanschke R, et al.  Cut edges and surface characteristics produced by different microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:690–700
  24. Møller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh D, Petroll M, Jester JV. Stromal wound healing explains refractive instability and haze development after photorefractive keratectomy; a 1-year confocal microscopic study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1235–1245
  25. Declaration of Helsinki. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964
  26. Petráň M, Hadravskŷ M, Egger MD, Galambos R. Tandem-scanning reflected-light microscope. J Opt Soc Am. 1968;58:661–664
  27. Boyde A. Applications of tandem scanning reflected light microscopy and three-dimensional imaging. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1986;483:428–439
  28. Kauffman T, Bodanowitz S, Hesse L, Kroll P. Corneal reinnervation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis (an in vivo study with a confocal videomicroscope). Ger J Ophthalmol. 1997;5:508–512
  29. Li HF, Petroll WM, Møller-Pedersen T. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:214–221
  30. Møller-Pedersen T, Li HF, Petroll WM, et al.  Confocal microscopic characterization of wound repair after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:487–501
  31. Møller-Pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, et al.  Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness, and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:360–368
  32. Durairaj VD, Balentine J, Kouyoumdjian G, et al.  The predictability of corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2140–2143
  33. Genth U, Mrochen M, Walti R, et al.  Optical low coherence reflectometry for noncontact measurements of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:973–978
  34. Maldonado MJ, Ruiz-Oblitas L, Munuera JM, et al.  Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:81–87 discussion by DR Hardten, 88
  35. Pérez-Santonja JJ, Bellot JL, Claramonte P, et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:372–385
  36. Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2001;20:480–483
  37. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Sutton HFS, Coleman DJ. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery; anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:474–482
  38. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, et al.  Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:414–430
  39. Yi W-M, Joo C-K. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using an SCMD manual microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1087–1092
  40. Liu K-Y, Lam DSC. Direct measurement of microkeratome gap width by electron microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:924–927
  41. Pisella PJ, Auzerie O, Bokobza Y, et al.  Evaluation of corneal stromal changes in vivo after laser in situ keratomileusis with confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1744–1750
  42. Wilson SE, He Y-G, Weng J, et al.  Epithelial injury induces keratocyte apoptosis (hypothesized role for the interleukin-1 system in the modulation of corneal tissue organization and wound healing). Exp Eye Res. 1996;62:325–337
  43. Møller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Neutralizing antibody TGFβ modulates stromal fibrosis but not regression of photoablative effect following PRK. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:736–747
  44. Berlau J, Becker H-H, Stave J, et al.  Depth and age-dependent distribution of keratocytes in healthy human corneas; a study using scanning-slit confocal microscopy in vivo. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:611–616
  45. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N. Thermal consequences of photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea. 2001;20:509–515
  46. Ivarsen A, Stultiens BAT, Møller-Pedersen T. Validation of confocal microscopy through focusing for corneal sublayer pachymetry. Cornea. 2002;21:700–704
  47. Mitooka K, Ramirez M, Maguire LJ, et al.  Keratocyte density of central human cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:307–314
  48. Helena MC, Baerveldt F, Kim W-J, Wilson SE. Keratocyte apoptosis after corneal surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:276–283
  49. Wilson SE, Kim W-J. Keratocyte apoptosis (implications on corneal wound healing, tissue organization, and disease). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:220–226
  50. Wilson SE. Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced (presumed) neurotrophic epitheliopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1082–1087

 The authors declare no proprietary or financial interest about any of the products used in the study.

☆☆ This study was supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, Red Temática de Investigación en Oftalmologia, Subproyecto de Cirugia Refractiva y Calidad Visual (C03/13).

PII: S0886-3350(03)01044-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.024

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 1300-1309 , June 2004