Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 1287-1294, June 2004

Quality of vision following clinically successful penetrating keratoplasty

  • Ayse Yagci, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationRequest reprints to Ayse Yagci, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.or
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Sait Egrilmez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationRequest reprints to Ayse Yagci, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.or
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
    • SSK Buca Hastanesi, Izmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mahmut Kaskaloglu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • E.Deniz Egrilmez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
    • SSK Buca Hastanesi, Izmir, Turkey

Accepted 29 October 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose: To evaluate visual function following clinically successful penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Methods: Patient group (PG) included 9 patients (12 eyes) who had clinically successful PKP in our department. The control group (CG) included 12 people (18 eyes) who had no ocular disease other than refractive errors. Those with a visual acuity level less than 20/25 were not included in the study. Contrast sensitivity levels and light threshold values of the central retina were measured; scanning-slit corneal topography–pachymetry and aberrometric analysis were performed.

Results: There were no statistical difference in terms of age (32.55 years ± 9.25 (SD) in PG, 36.75 ± 5.85 years in CG; P = .53), cylinder power in plus form (2.60 ± 1.25 diopter (D) in PG, 2.79 D ± 2.51 D in CG; P = .88), and spherical equivalent of refractive errors (−3.66 ± 3.57 D in PG, −5.52 ± 3.37 D in CG; P = .29) between the PG and CG. Cambridge low-contrast grating scores were 96.5 ± 41.1 in grafted eyes and 148 ± 27.7 in CG (P = .004). Central retinal light sensitivity was measured as 29.91 ± 2.39 db in PG and 33.08 ± 1.56 db in CG (P = .001). In corneal topographic analysis, mean kappa intercept was 0.69 ± 0.37 mm in PG and 0.55 ± 0.24 mm in CG (P = .20). Lower-order Zernike root mean squares (RMS) were 7.30 ± 3.89 μm for PG and 8.58 ± 3.46 μm for CG (P = .37). However, higher-order Zernike RMS were 2.15 ± 0.78 in PG and 0.38 ± 0.10 in CG, which is a statistically significant difference (P<.001).

Conclusions: Even though the clinically successful PKP patients have correctable amount of spherocylindrical refractive errors with spectacle lenses, they still have reduced visual quality because of the significantly high amount of higher- order aberrations when compared with naturally occurring refractive errors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any product mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00004-5

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.037

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 1287-1294, June 2004