Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 10 , Pages 2183-2191, October 2004

Capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch after rigid and foldable intraocular lens implantation:☆☆★★

Experimental study in pediatric human eyes

  • Suresh K. Pandey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Suresh K. Pandey, MD, John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
    • From David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
  • ,
  • Liliana Werner, MD,PhD

      Affiliations

    • From David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
  • ,
  • M.Edward Wilson Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Miles Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
  • ,
  • Andrea M. Izak, MD

      Affiliations

    • From David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
  • ,
  • David J. Apple, MD

      Affiliations

    • From David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA

Accepted 18 February 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose: To compare the amount of capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch produced by various intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted in pediatric human eyes obtained post-mortem.

Setting: David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Methods: In this nonrandomized comparative study, 16 pediatric human eyes obtained postmortem were divided into 2 groups: Eight eyes were obtained from children younger than 2 years (Group A), and 8 eyes were obtained from children older than 2 years (Group B). All eyes were prepared according to the Miyake-Apple posterior video technique. Six types of rigid and foldable posterior chamber IOLs manufactured from poly(methyl methacrylate) (single-piece), silicone (plate and loop haptics), and hydrophobic acrylic (single-piece and 3-piece AcrySof®, Alcon Laboratories) biomaterials were implanted. The capsulorhexis opening and capsular bag diameters were measured before IOL implantation and after in-the-bag IOL fixation with the haptics (or the main axis) at the 3 to 9 o'clock meridian. The percentage of ovaling of the capsulorhexis opening was calculated by noting the difference in the opening's horizontal diameter before and after IOL implantation. The percentage of capsular bag stretch was also calculated by noting the difference in the horizontal capsular bag diameter before and after IOL implantation.

Results: All IOLs produced ovaling of the capsulorhexis opening and stretching of the capsular bag parallel to the IOL haptics. There were significant differences in capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch (P<.001, analysis of variance) between the 6 IOL types in each group of eyes. The postimplantation difference was significant only between the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof) and the other IOLs. The single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL was associated with significantly less capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch in both groups (mean 12.06% ± 0.59% [SD] and 7.6% ± 1.47%, respectively).

Conclusions: Modern rigid and foldable IOLs designed for the adult population implanted in the capsular bag of infants and children produced variable degrees of capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch. The Miyake-Apple posterior video technique confirmed the well-maintained configuration of the capsular bag (with minimal ovaling) after implantation of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL because of its flexible haptic design.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the annual meeting of American Academy of Ophthalmology, Orlando, Florida, USA, October 2002.

☆☆ Supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, NY, USA.

 None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

★★ Donor families and the Utah Lions Eye Bank have provided ongoing support for the research.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00324-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.079

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 10 , Pages 2183-2191, October 2004