Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 11 , Pages 2415-2419, November 2004

Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings☆☆

Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany

Accepted 4 March 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of keratectomy specimens created with the Amadeus® microkeratome (AMO) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Setting: Johannes Gutenberg-University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Mainz, and the Department of Anatomy, Justus Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Methods: Corneal cuts were performed in freshly enucleated pig eyes using the Amadeus microkeratome with 9 combinations of oscillation rate and head-advance speed. For the cutting trials, oscillation rates of 8000, 13000, and 18000 rpm and head-advance speeds of 1.0, 2.5, and 4.0 mm/s were chosen. Fifty-four eyes were included, resulting in 9 groups of 6 eyes for each configuration. The surfaces and edges of the flaps were examined using SEM.

Results: At fixed oscillation rates, an increase in head-advance speed led to lower quality cuts, higher surface roughness, and irregular cut edges. At fixed head-advance speeds, an increase in oscillation rates improved the cut quality, resulting in smoother surface characteristics.

Conclusions: Smooth and regular surfaces and cut edges can be achieved by choosing high oscillation rates and low head-advance speeds. Microkeratomes that enable the user to adjust the oscillation rate and head-advance speed can be used to maximize surface smoothness and improve customized refractive surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors has a proprietary or financial interest in any device mentioned.

☆☆ Presented in part at the ASCRS Symposium of Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA, April 2003.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00404-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.03.036

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 11 , Pages 2415-2419, November 2004