Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 10 , Pages 2207-2208 , October 2004

Beyond the P: II: Precluding a puddle of P values

  • Kirk R. Wilhelmus, MD,PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Kirk R. Wilhelmus, MD, PhD, 6565 Fannin, NC-205, Houston, Texas 77030, USA

References 

  1. Babbage C. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, and on Some of Its Causes. London, B Fellowes, 1830; 178–179
  2. Mills JL. Data torturing. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1196–1199
  3. Moyé LA. Statistical Reasoning in Medicine (the Intuitive P-Value Primer). New York: Springer; 2000; , 167–169
  4. Fisher RA. The arrangement of field experiments. J Ministry Agriculture Great Britain. 1926;33: available at http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher/548.pdf
  5. Proschan MA, Waclawiw MA. Practical guidelines for multiplicity adjustment in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:527–539
  6. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236–1238
  7. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:343–349
  8. Savitz DA, Olshan AF. Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:904–908
  9. Thompson JR. Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:801–806 [invited commentary]

☆ Supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute, a senior scientific investigator award from the Research to Prevent Blindness, and the Sid W. Richardson Foundation.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00772-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.082

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 10 , Pages 2207-2208 , October 2004

Article Tools