« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 11
, Pages 2425-2426
, November 2004
Beyond the P: III: Possible insignificance of the nonsignificant P value
References
- . Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311:485; [Statistics notes]
- . Claims of equivalence in medical research (are they supported by the evidence?). Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:715–722
- Sample size calculations in surgery (are they done correctly?). Surgery. 2003;134:275–279
- . When does the failure to find a difference mean that there is none?. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:1034–1040
- . Distinguishing between “no evidence of effect” and “evidence of no effect” in randomised controlled trials and other comparisons. Arch Dis Child. 1999;80:210–211
- . Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests?. BMJ. 2001;322:226–231
- . Nausea and vomiting after phacoemulsification using topical or retrobulbar anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1973–1976
- . Underpowering in randomized trials reporting a sample size calculation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:717–720
-
.
The abuse of power (the persuasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis).
Am Statistician. 2001;55:19–24
- . Statistics review 4 (sample size calculations). Crit Care. 2002;6:335–341
-
P values.
In:
Bailar JC, Mosteller F editor. Medical Uses of Statistics. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: NEJM Books; 1992;p. 181–200
☆ Supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute, a senior scientific investigator award from Research to Prevent Blindness, and the Sid W. Richardson Foundation.
PII: S0886-3350(04)00848-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.083
© 2004 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 11
, Pages 2425-2426
, November 2004
