Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 146-155 , January 2005

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis

  • Jun Liu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Jun Liu, PhD, 270 Bevis Hall, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
  • ,
  • Cynthia J. Roberts, PhD

,Accepted 13 August 2004.

References 

  1. Faucher A, Grégoire J, Blondeau P. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:832–838
  2. Chatterjee A, Shah S, Bessant DA, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy; correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:355–359
  3. Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J, et al. Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:905–910
  4. Argento C, Cosentino MJ, Moussalli MA. Intraocular pressure measurement following hyperopic LASIK. [letter] J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:145
  5. Recep ÖF, Çagil N, Hasiripi H. Correlation between intraocular pressure and corneal stromal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1480–1483
  6. Montés-Micó R, Charman WN. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:228–235
  7. Munger R, Dohadwala AA, Hodge WG, et al. Changes in measured intraocular pressure after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1254–1262
  8. Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, et al. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:261–265
  9. Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:420–427
  10. Alonso-Muñoz L, Lleó-Pérez A, Rahhal MS, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. Assessment of applanation tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2002;21:156–160
  11. Damji KF, Muni RH, Munger RM. Influence of corneal variables on accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:69–80
  12. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746–751
  13. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 1975;53:34–43
  14. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592–596
  15. Argus WA. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1810–1812
  16. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367–408
  17. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1–30
  18. Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66:134–140
  19. Smolek MK. Holographic interferometry of intact and radially incised human eye-bank corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:277–286
  20. Hjortdal JØ. Regional elastic performance of the human cornea. J Biomech. 1996;29:931–942
  21. Quigley HA, Dorman-Pease ME, Brown AE. Quantitative study of collagen and elastin of the optic nerve head and sclera in human and experimental monkey glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 1991;10:877–888
  22. Woo SL-Y, Kobayashi AS, Schlegel WA, Lawrence C. Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res. 1972;14:29–39
  23. Gloster J. Tonometry and Tonography. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1965;(Int Ophthalmol Clin 1965; vol 5, no 4)
  24. La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:23–27
  25. Shawartz NJ, Mackay RS, Sackman JL. A theoretical and experimental study of the mechanical behavior of the cornea with application to the measurement of the intraocular pressure. Bull Math Biophys. 1966;28:585–643
  26. Jue B, Maurice DM. The mechanical properties of rabbit and human cornea. J Biomech. 1986;19:847–853
  27. Hoeltzel DA, Altman P, Buzard K, Choe K. Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. J Biomech Eng. 1992;114:202–215
  28. Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW, Whitacre MM, Sigmund KD. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:945–948discussion by WA Argus, 949
  29. Patel S, Aslanides IM. Main causes of reduced intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. [letter] J Refract Surg. 1996;12:673
  30. Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S589–S592
  31. Mow CC. A theoretical model of the cornea for use in studies of tonometry. Bull Math Biophys. 1968;30:437–453
  32. Young WC. Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain. 6th ed.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1989;
  33. Mandell RB, St Helen R. Position and curvature of the corneal apex. Am J Optom. 1969;46:25–29
  34. Kiely PM, Smith G, Carney LG. The mean shape of the human cornea. Optica Acta. 1982;29:1027–1040
  35. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol. 1999;61:551–572
  36. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study; Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma; the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714–720
  37. Roberts C, Dupps WJ. Corneal biomechanics and their role in corneal ablative procedures. In:  MacRae SM,  Krueger RR,  Applegate RA editor. Customized Corneal Ablation; the Quest for SuperVision. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2001;p. 109–131
  38. Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Levinson SF. Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue—a review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:959–977
  39. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, et al. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 1999;213:203–233
  40. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998;20:260–274
  41. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993;
  42. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elasticity. 2000;61:1–48
  43. Navajas D, Maksym GN, Bates JHT. Dynamic viscoelastic nonlinearity of lung parenchymal tissue. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79:348–356
  44. Lafrance H, Guillot M, Germain L, Auger FA. A method for the evaluation of tensile properties of skin equivalents. Med Eng Phys. 1995;17:537–543
  45. Förster W, Stupp T, Kasprzak H. Holographic interferometry of excimer-laser-ablated bovine eyes: first results. Ophthalmologica. 2003;217:62–67
  46. Smolek MK. Holographic interferometry of intact and radially incised human eye-bank corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:277–286
  47. Wang H, Prendiville PL, McDonnell PJ, Chang WV. An ultrasonic technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human cornea. J Biomech. 1996;29:1633–1636
  48. Hollman KW, Emelianov SY, Neiss JH, et al. Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope. Cornea. 2002;21:68–73

 Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Supported by Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation and the Ann Ellis Fund from the Columbus Foundation.Xueliang Pan, MS, provided discussions on the model.

PII: S0886-3350(04)00959-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 146-155 , January 2005