Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 712-717, April 2005

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study

From the Ophthalmic Unit, Hospital and University of Verona (Bellucci, Morselli, Chierego), Verona, the Ophthalmic Hospital of Milan (Scialdone, Criscuoli, Moretti), and CAMO (Buratto), Milan, Italy; Pharmacia Corporation (Piers), Groningen, The Nederlands

Accepted 26 August 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic patients implanted either with the aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) designed to correct for corneal spherical aberration or with a conventional IOL.

Setting

Three surgical centers participated this prospective randomized masked comparative study.

Methods

Thirty eyes of 30 patients after aspheric lens implantation (Pfizer/Pharmacia Tecnis Z9000) were compared with 30 eyes of 30 age-matched patients after conventional lens implantation (Alcon AcrySof SA60AT). Two to three months after surgery, best spectacle corrected distance visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Contrast sensitivity was measured by sinusoidal grating charts for distance at photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (6 cd/m2) luminance level with optical correction in place. Tested spatial frequencies were 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd).

Results

The mean BCVA was −0.053 ± 0.044 logMAR in eyes with the aspheric Tecnis IOL and 0.006 ± 0.059 logMAR in eyes with the conventional AcrySof IOL (P=.0001). Eyes with the aspheric IOL showed better contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies of 3 cpd (P<.05) and 6, 12, and 18 cpd (P<.01) in photopic and in mesopic conditions. Peak improvement occurred at 18 cpd and was 36% (0.29 log units) in photopic and 54% (0.27 log units) in mesopic conditions.

Conclusions

The aspheric Tecnis IOL yielded better BCVA and better distance contrast sensitivity than the conventional IOL. The differences were clinically significant for higher spatial frequencies. The results give some suggestions for further studies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from Pharmacia/Pfizer Corp., Peapack, New Jersey.Dr. Piers is an employee of Pfizer Corporation, Groningen, The Nederlands. Dr. Bellucci has been a consultant to Pharmacia/Pfizer Corp., Peapack, New Jersey.

PII: S0886-3350(04)01133-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.049

Refers to erratum:

  • Errata

    Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery October 2005 (Vol. 31, Issue 10, Page 1857)

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 712-717, April 2005