Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 5 , Pages 895-902 , May 2005

Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens

,Accepted 8 October 2004.

References 

  1. Slagsvold JE. 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: eight year follow up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:402–407
  2. Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation; a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2040–2048
  3. Gray PJ, Lyall MG. Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in presbyopic patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:336–337
  4. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2005–2009discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
  5. Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Zwei Jahre Erfahrung mit der akkommodativen Hinterkammerlinse 1CU. Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:820–824
  6. Emery JM. Phakoemulsification—cataract surgery of the future?. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1978;182:155–170
  7. Kohnen T, Mann PM, Husain SE, et al. Corneal topographic changes and induced astigmatism resulting from superior and temporal scleral pocket incisions. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996;27:263–269
  8. Bissen-Miyajima H, Katsumi O, Shimbo R, et al. Contrast visual acuities in cataract patients. III. Changes of contrast acuity profiles in normal and pathological eyes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995;73:50–55
  9. Wang G-J, Pomerantzeff O. A new set of variable-contrast visual acuity charts. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:34–40
  10. Ukai K, Ishikawa S. [A quasistatic study on accommodation]. (Japanese) Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1983;87:1428–1434
  11. Kinoshita S. [Pathogenesis and treatment of accommodative disturbance]. (Japanese) Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;98:1256–1268
  12. Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, et al. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:816–821
  13. Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, et al. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1109–1112
  14. Kamlesh DS, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36:197–201
  15. Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:208–216
  16. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307–1312
  17. Fukuyama M, Oshika T, Amano S, Yoshitomi F. Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1178–1181
  18. Hillman JS, Bradbury JA. Apparent accommodation by myopic astigmatism with monofocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Implant Refract Surg. 1990;2:101–104
  19. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:49–54discussion by RC Drews, 54–55

 Presented in part at the 57th Japan Congress of Clinical Ophthalmology, Nagoya, Japan, October–November 2003, and at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 25–29, 2004.No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(04)01234-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.062

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 5 , Pages 895-902 , May 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution