Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 7 , Pages 1298-1305 , July 2005

Drug-induced intraocular lens movement and near visual acuity after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation

,Accepted 17 November 2004.

References 

  1. Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia: neuromuscular and biophysical aspects. In:  Hart WM editors. Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. 9th ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992;p. 391–411
  2. Arnoldi KA. The anatomy of accommodation. Am Orthoptic J. 2000;50:89–95
  3. Helmholtz H. Ueber die Accomodation des Auges. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1855;1(2):1–74
  4. Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:435–438
  5. Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1458–1460
  6. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1243–1255
  7. Lindstrom RL. Food and Drug Administration study update; one year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:91–97
  8. Fukuyama M, Oshika T, Amano S, Yoshitomi F. Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1178–1181
  9. Findl O, Kiss B, Petternel V, et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:669–676
  10. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307–1312
  11. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2005–2010
  12. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Pande MV, et al. Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:352–360
  13. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, Pande MV. Biocompatibility of poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and AcrySof intraocular lenses; randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:361–366
  14. Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685
  15. Gonzalez F, Capeans C, Santos L, et al. Anteroposterior shift in rigid and soft implants supported by the intraocular capsular bag. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230:237–239
  16. Lesiewska-Junk H, Kałużny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eye of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:562–565
  17. In:  Siegel S,  Castellan NJ editor. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988;p. 174–183
  18. Urbak SF. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. III. Accuracy and agreement of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:293–297
  19. Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy of the Eye. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995;30–46
  20. Tello C, Liebmann J, Potash SD, et al. Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3549–3552
  21. Garcia-Feijoó J, Jiménez Alfaro I, Cuiña-Sardiña R, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy examination of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens position. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:163–172
  22. Hardman Lea SJ, Rubinstein MP, Snead MP, Haworth SM. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:22–25
  23. Vetrugno M, Cardascia N, Cardia L. Anterior chamber depth measured by two methods in myopic and hyperopic phakic IOL implant. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1113–1116
  24. Naeser K, Naeser A, Boberg-Ans J, Bargum R. Axial length following implantation of posterior chamber lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15:673–675
  25. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Kiss B, et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurement methods in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:89–94
  26. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Elapsed time for capsular apposition to intraocular lens after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1427–1431
  27. Yamamoto S, Adachi-Usami E. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eye as measured with visually evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:443–446
  28. Ravalico G, Baccara F. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990;68:604–606
  29. Elder MJ, Murphy C, Sanderson GF. Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:615–619
  30. Yasuda A, Yamaguchi T, Ohkoshi K. Changes in corneal curvature in accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1297–1301

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00055-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.11.042

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 7 , Pages 1298-1305 , July 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution