Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 11 , Pages 2088-2092, November 2005

Blue-light filtering intraocular lens in patients with diabetes: Contrast sensitivity and chromatic discrimination

From the Refractive Surgery Unit (Rodríguez-Galietero, Montés-Micó, Muñoz, Albarrán-Diego), Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar, Valencia, and VISSUM Ophthalmologic Institute of Alicante (Montés-Micó, Muñoz), Alicante, Spain

Accepted 5 April 2005.

Purpose

To evaluate potential changes in contrast sensitivity and color discrimination in diabetic patients who had cataract surgery and implantation of the blue-light filtering AcrySof Natural (SN60AT) intraocular lens (IOL) compared with an ultraviolet-only filtering (AcrySof SA60AT) IOL.

Setting

Refractive Surgery Unit, Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar, Valencia, Spain.

Methods

Forty-four eyes of 22 diabetic patients were enrolled in a blue-light filtering fellow-eye control study. Patients received yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof Natural) in 1 eye and non–yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof SA60AT) in the fellow eye. Three months after surgery, monocular contrast sensitivity function was measured with the CSV 1000-E contrast sensitivity chart at distance and color discrimination was tested with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test.

Results

Eyes implanted with the blue-light filtering IOLs showed better contrast sensitivity values than fellow eyes implanted with non–yellow-tinted IOLs (P<.05). The blue-light filtering IOL did not modify chromatic discrimination compared with the non–yellow-tinted IOL (P = .62). In the blue–yellow axis discrimination study, the eyes implanted with the AcrySof Natural IOL had statistically significant better color vision (P = .008).

Conclusions

In diabetic patients, the AcrySof Natural IOL provides better contrast sensitivity than the AcrySof SA60AT. The blue-light filter of the AcrySof Natural IOL did not cause chromatic discrimination defects based on total error scores and improved color vision in the blue–yellow chromatic axis in diabetic patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial and proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00676-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.029

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 11 , Pages 2088-2092, November 2005