Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 11 , Pages 2129-2132 , November 2005

Comparison of Colvard pupillometer and infrared digital photography for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter

,Accepted 11 April 2005.

References 

  1. Brown SM, Khanani AM, Xu KT. Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:639–644
  2. Khanani AM, Brown SM, Archer SM. Horizontal versus vertical dark-adapted pupil diameters in normal individuals. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2557–2558
  3. Twa MD, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Bullimore M. Estimation of pupil size by digital photography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:381–389
  4. Brown SM, Bradley JC, Khanani AM. Duration of pupillary constriction in response to a photographic flash. [letter] J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:455–456
  5. Borgmann H. Grundlagen für eine klinishe Pupillographie. II. Abhängigkeit des Pupillendurchmessers in Dunkelheit vom Lebensalter. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1972;184:300–308
  6. Loewenfeld IE. Pupillary changes related to age. In:  Thompson HS,  Daroff R,  Frisén L, et al. editor. Topics in Neuro-Ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1979;p. 124–150
  7. Brown SM, Campbell CE. Systematic underablation in laser in situ keratomileusis: ablation pattern identified by advanced topographical analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1621–1625
  8. Kohnen T. Consultation section: refractive surgery problem. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1392–1395

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(05)00749-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.041

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 11 , Pages 2129-2132 , November 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution