Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 12 , Page 2242 , December 2005

How dark is “dark”? Experimental methods in clinical research

References 

  1. Wilhelmus KR. Beyond the P: I: problems with probability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2005–2006
  2. Wilhelmus KR. Beyond the P: II: precluding a puddle of P values. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2207–2208
  3. Wilhelmus KR. Beyond the P: III: possible insignificance of the nonsignificant P value. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2425–2426
  4. Wilhelmus KR. Beyond the P: IV: gain confidence in confidence intervals. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2618–2619
  5. Riegelman RK. Studying a Study and Testing a Test, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000;
  6. Koch DD, Kohnen T, Obstbaum SA, Rosen ES. Format for reporting refractive surgical data. [editorial] J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:285–287
  7. Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB. Monocular versus binocular pupillometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2551–2556
  8. Sakatani K, Jabbur NS, O'Brien TP. Improvement in best corrected visual acuity in amblyopic adult eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2517–2521
  9. Koch DD. Validating and disproving what we “know”. [editorial] J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1815–1816

PII: S0886-3350(05)00980-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.11.041

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 12 , Page 2242 , December 2005

Article Tools