Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 12 , Page 2244 , December 2005

Reply: Autorefraction versus subjective refraction

References 

  1. Pesudovs K. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1921–1928
  2. Øyo-Szerenyi KD, Wienecke L, Businger U, Schipper I. Autorefraction/autokeratometry and subjective refraction in untreated and phtorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:157–164
  3. Salchow DJ, Zirm ME, Stieldorf C, Parisi A. Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:827–835
  4. Rosa N, Iura A, Romano M, et al. Correlation between automated and subjective refraction before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:449–453
  5. Siganos DS, Popescu C, Bessis N, Papastergiou G. Autorefractometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:133–137
  6. Bailey MD, Twa MD, Mitchell GL, et al. The repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1025–1034
  7. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004;4:322–328
  8. Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis. 2004;4:310–321
  9. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329–351
  10. Thibos LN. Unresolved issues in the prediction of subjective refraction from wavefront aberration maps. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S533–S536

PII: S0886-3350(05)01019-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.022

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 12 , Page 2244 , December 2005

Article Tools