Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 411-418, March 2006

Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes:

Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence

  • Francis W. Price Jr., MD
  • ,
  • Marianne O. Price, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Marianne O. Price, PhD, Cornea Research Foundation of America 9002 North Meridian Street, Suite 212 Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, USA.

From the Price Vision Group (F.W. Price) and the Cornea Research Foundation of America (M.O. Price), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Accepted 1 August 2005.

Purpose

To describe early challenges and techniques to promote donor tissue adherence in Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

Setting

Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Methods

The first 200 consecutive cases of DSEK performed by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up was 7 to 20 months for 124 eyes and 2 to 6 months for 76 eyes. The surgical technique consisted of stripping Descemet's membrane and endothelium from the recipient's central cornea and transplanting an 8.0 to 9.0 mm disc of donor endothelium and posterior stroma through a 5.0 mm incision, with sutures used only to close the incision.

Results

The most frequent challenge was inadequate donor attachment. Using techniques to remove fluid from the donor–recipient graft interface, the donor detachment rate in the last 64 cases was 6%, with half attributable to patient eye rubbing. Detached grafts were reattached by injecting an air bubble to press the donor against the recipient cornea. There were 7 primary graft failures, with only 1 occurring in the second 100 cases, which primarily used microkeratome-dissected donor tissue. Other complications were infrequent and included pupillary block glaucoma (1), aqueous misdirection syndrome (1), and cataract development in 2 of 27 phakic eyes. The DSEK procedure was performed safely before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (1 each).

Conclusions

Early outcomes in the initial 200 consecutive DSEK procedures suggest the technique provides significant advantages over penetrating keratoplasty, including more rapid healing, more predictable refractive outcomes, and better retention of corneal strength and integrity. Although donor adherence was more challenging, DSEK was technically easier and should be less traumatic to anterior chamber structures than earlier posterior grafting techniques.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Washington, DC, USA, April 15–19, 2005.F.W. Price received travel grants from Moria. The other author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Clorissa Quillin, Stacey Henderson, Susan Simon, and the staff of Price Vision Group for provided outstanding technical assistance.

PII: S0886-3350(05)01076-X

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.078

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 411-418, March 2006