Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 565-572, April 2006

Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism:

Temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions

From the Cataract Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Accepted 21 August 2005.

Purpose

To determine whether there is a difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 2 types of clear corneal incisions used in phacoemulsification: the temporal and the on-axis (ie, on the steeper corneal meridian) clear corneal incision (CCTI and CCOI, respectively).

Setting

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Methods

In a prospective randomized controlled trial (pilot study), 61 eyes with cataract and mild to moderate corneal astigmatism (<2.58 diopters [D] on corneal topography) having phacoemulsification (single surgeon, 3.2 mm incision) were randomized to receive CCTI or CCOI. Main outcome measures included postoperative BCVA and corneal astigmatism and SIA (calculated using the Holladay vector analysis formula). Measurements were repeated postoperatively at 3 weeks in all eyes, whereas only 46 eyes made it to the final assessment at 8 weeks. Continuous variables between groups were compared by Student t test. The power of the study was calculated.

Results

At the first follow-up, the difference in SIA between the 2 incision types was 0.15 D and it was not statistically significant (0.65 D in CCOI; 0.50 D in CCTI). At the second follow-up, the difference was 0.29 D and it was statistically significant (0.63 D in CCOI; 0.34 D in CCTI; P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in the final postoperative visual acuity. The power of the pilot study was 72%.

Conclusion

Seven weeks after small-incision phacoemulsification, the CCTI induced less SIA than the CCOI; however, there were no significant differences in the final UCVA and BCVA.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented as a poster at the XXIInd Congress of the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, Paris, France, September 2004.No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.W. Dupont and W. Plummer provided the shareware program PS Power and Sample Size Calculations V 2.13, with which the power of the study was calculated.

PII: S0886-3350(05)01099-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.104

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 565-572, April 2006