Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1091-1097 , July 2006

Analysis of patients with good uncorrected distance and near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation

,Accepted 28 December 2005.

References 

  1. Huber C. Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J. 1981;7:244–249
  2. Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:435–438
  3. Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1458–1460
  4. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism; a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1981;52:123–178
  5. Hardman Lea SJ, Rubinstein MP, Snead MP, Haworth SM. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:22–25
  6. Gonzalez F, Capeans C, Santos L, et al. Anterioposterior shift in rigid and soft implants supported by the intraocular capsular bag. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;20:237–239
  7. Verzella F, Calossi A. Multifocal effects of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:58–61
  8. Trindade F, Oliveira A, Frasson M. Benefit of against-the-rule astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:82–85
  9. Nagpal KM, Desai C, Trivedi RH, Vasavada AR. Is pseudophakic astigmatism a desirable goal?. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000;48:213–216
  10. Bradbury JA, Hillman JS, Cassells-Brown A. Optimal postoperative refraction for good unaided near and distance vision with monofocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:300–302
  11. Datiles MB, Gancayco T. Low myopia with low astigmatic correction gives cataract surgery patients good depth of focus. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:922–926
  12. Yamamoto S, Adachi-Usami E. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes as measured with visually evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:443–446
  13. Elder MJ, Murphy C, Sanderson GF. Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:615–619
  14. Percival SPB, Setty SS. Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccommodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:26–31
  15. Thornton SP. Lens implantation with restored accommodation. Curr Canadian Ophthalmic Pract. 1986;4:60–62
  16. Lesiewska-Junk H, Kałużny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:562–565
  17. Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M, et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2069–2072
  18. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:432–436
  19. Fukuyama M, Oshika T, Amano S, Yoshitomi F. Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1178–1181
  20. Oshika T, Mimura T, Tanaka S, et al. Apparent accommodation and corneal wavefront aberration in pseudophakic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2882–2886
  21. Richards SC, Steen DW. Clinical evaluation of the Holladay and SRK II formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:71–74
  22. Vasavada AR, Singh R. Step-by-step chop in situ and separation of very dense cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:156–159
  23. Vasavada AR, Desai JP. Stop, chop, chop, and stuff. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:526–529
  24. Vasavada AR, Raj S. Step-down technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1077–1079
  25. Findl O, Kiss B, Petternel V, et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:669–676
  26. Abrams D. Duke-Elder's Practice of Refraction. 10th ed. London, BJ: Churchill Livingstone; 1993;
  27. Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Huber S, et al. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1722–1727
  28. Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685
  29. Ravalico G, Baccara F. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;68:604–606
  30. Sawusch MR, Guyton DL. Optimal astigmatism to enhance depth of focus after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1025–1029
  31. Wirtitsch MG, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Effect of haptic design on change of axial lens position after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:45–51
  32. Woo SJ, Lee JH. Effect of central corneal thickness on surgically induced astigmatism in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2401–2406
  33. Probst LE. The problem with pupils. [guest editorial] J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2–4
  34. Charman WN. Restoring accommodation to the presbyopic eye: how do we measure success?. [editorial] J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2251–2254
  35. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, et al. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:453–459
  36. Mishima HK, Shoge K, Takamatsu M, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of ciliary body thickness after topical application of pharmacologic agents. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;21:319–321
  37. Németh J, Csákány B, Pregun T. Ultrasound biomicroscopic morphometry of the anterior eye segment before and after one drop of pilocarpine. Int Ophthalmol. 1996–1997;20:39–42
  38. Wang T, Liu L, Li Z, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study on changes of ocular anterior segment structure after topical application of cycloplegia. Chin Med J. 1999;112:217–220
  39. Legeais J-M, Werner L, Werner L, et al. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:262–267
  40. Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1878–1888
  41. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses; the Erlangen Accommodative Intraocular Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:318–324

 Presented in part at the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Washington, D.C., USA, April 2005.No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(06)00312-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.03.021

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1091-1097 , July 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution