Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1098-1103 , July 2006

Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens

,Accepted 19 January 2006.

References 

  1. Montés-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, et al. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses; mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:85–96
  2. Sen HN, Sarikkola A-U, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2483–2493
  3. Javitt J, Brauweiler H-P, Jacobi KW, et al. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes; multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1356–1366
  4. Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M, et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2069–2072
  5. Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Huber S, et al. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1722–1727
  6. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307–1312
  7. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses; the Erlangen Accommodative Intraocular Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:318–324
  8. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism; a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1981;52:123–178
  9. Verzella F, Calossi A. Multifocal effects of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:58–61
  10. Elder MJ, Murphy C, Sanderson GF. Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:615–619
  11. Oshika T, Mimura T, Tanaka S, et al. Apparent accommodation and corneal wavefront aberration in pseudophakic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2882–2886
  12. Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1878–1888
  13. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1435–1444
  14. Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, Wei J. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1843–1850
  15. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, et al. High precision biometry of pseudophakic eyes using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1087–1093
  16. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, et al. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:861–867
  17. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Kiss B, et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurement methods in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:89–94
  18. Rodríguez P, Navarro R, González L, Hernández JL. Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:810–817
  19. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, et al. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:453–459
  20. Pallikaris IG, Panagopoulou SI, Molebny VV. Clinical experience with the Tracey technology wavefront device. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S588–S591
  21. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, et al. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:207–213
  22. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2324–2329
  23. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, et al. Laser interferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1515–1521
  24. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:895–902
  25. Findl O, Kiss B, Petternel V, et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:669–676
  26. Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685
  27. Sacu S, Findl O, Linnola RJ. Optical coherence tomography assessment of capsule closure after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:330–336
  28. Stachs O, Schneider H, Stave J, Guthoff R. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses—an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:37–45
  29. Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses; pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2476–2482
  30. Pallikaris IG, Panagopoulou SI, Siganos CS, Molebny VV. Objective measurement of wavefront aberrations with and without accommodation. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S602–S607
  31. Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:8–26
  32. Vargas LG, Auffarth GU, Becker KA, et al. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:363–368
  33. Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Reese S, et al. Accommodation after Nd:YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens 1CU. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:120–126

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(06)00315-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.092

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1098-1103 , July 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution