Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1129-1141, July 2006

Role of flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for refractive undercorrection

  • Gerald W. Flanagan, OD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Gerald W. Flanagan, OD, MPH, CooperVision, Inc., Advanced Development Center, 5870 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 1, Pleasanton, California 94588, USA.
  • ,
  • Perry S. Binder, MD, MS

From the Gordon Binder and Weiss Vision Institute, San Diego, California, USA

Accepted 13 January 2006.

Purpose

To determine which preoperative and/or perioperative factors determine the need for an enhancement for refractive undercorrection in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for spherical or spherocylindrical myopia.

Setting

Clinical refractive surgery outpatient facility.

Methods

In this nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort, 3850 of the 9777 eyes operated on between January 1996 and August 2005 who met the selection criteria were studied. Only patients whose refractive goal was plano were included. Control eyes were those whose latest spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was within ±0.37 diopters (D) of emmetropia. Cases were defined as enhancements for undercorrection with an SE refraction worse than or equal to −0.50 D performed less than 6 months following the primary surgery.

Results

Factors associated with enhancement included increasing patient age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.048, P<.001), decreasing follow-up time (OR = 0.994, P<.001), increasing minus laser sphere (OR = 0.700, P<.001) and cylinder settings (OR = 0.718, P<.001), female sex (OR = 1.112, P = .046), and corneal toricity (OR = 1.237, P = .012). The Summit laser had a significant risk for enhancement (OR = 1.726, P<.001) compared with the Visx laser, whereas the Wavelight Allegretto had a lowered risk (OR = 0.630, P = .049). Enhancement risk with the Autonomous was no different from that with the Visx (OR = 1.120, P = .342). Increasing flap thickness (OR = 1.009, P<.001) was more strongly associated with enhancement risk than residual stromal bed thickness.

Conclusions

After controlling for patient age, time to follow-up or surgery, corneal cylinder, sphere and cylinder laser settings, laser manufacturer, patient sex, and corneal thickness, increasing flap thickness was found to be a more important predictor of enhancement for refractive undercorrection than residual stromal thickness.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0886-3350(06)00319-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.095

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 7 , Pages 1129-1141, July 2006