« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 11
, Pages 1926-1931
, November 2006
Comparison of 2 multiple-measurement infrared pupillometers to determine scotopic pupil diameter
References
- . Quantify. [editorial] J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:203–204
- . Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2272–2280
- Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1606–1614
- Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:136–140
- Night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: haze and halos. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1994;4:43–51
- The relationship of visual acuity, refractive error, and pupil size after radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:70–76
- Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients; the Canadian Refractive Surgery Research Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1790–1796
- . Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis; comparison of optical side effects; Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:925–933
- . Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:251–257
- . Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis: etiology, prevention, and treatment. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:350–379
- . Optical disturbances and their management after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000;40(1):45–56
- . Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:454–460
- Use of a digital infrared pupillometer to assess patient suitability for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1433–1438
- . Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:1132–1137
- Mathematical procedures in data recording and processing of pupillary fatigue waves. Vision Res. 1998;38:2889–2896
- . Anisocoria; variation and clinical observation with different conditions of illumination and accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:501–509
- Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD-camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2116–2123
- . Comparison of a digital and a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:112–117
- . Comparison of three different technologies for pupil diameter measurement. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:472–477
- . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
- . Foundations of Clinical Research; Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000;485–486, 560–562
- . Comparison of dynamic digital pupillometry and static measurements of pupil size in determining scotopic pupil size before refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1171–1176
- . Monocular versus binocular pupillometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2551–2556
Neuroptics Inc. provided the pupillometer for this study at no cost.No author has a proprietary or financial interest in any material or method mentioned.
PII: S0886-3350(06)01055-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.019
© 2006 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 11
, Pages 1926-1931
, November 2006
