Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 21-30, January 2007

Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for intraocular lens calculation after excimer laser surgery for myopia

From a private practice (Qazi, Pepose) and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Qazi, Pepose), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering Department (Roberts), Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; St. Luke's Medical Center (Cua), Quezon City, Philippines

Accepted 13 August 2006.

Purpose

To assess the accuracy of Orbscan II slit-scanning videokeratography for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in eyes with previous photorefractive surgery for myopia.

Setting

Private practice, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Methods

Corneal power (K) was measured by manual keratometry, Placido-based videokeratography (Atlas), slit-scanning videokeratography (Orbscan II), and contact lens overrefraction in 21 post-photoablation eyes having cataract surgery. Postoperative data collected after phacoemulsification were used to back-calculate corneal power (BCK). The BCK values were statistically compared at 3.0 to 6.0 mm central Orbscan II curvature and power measurements, including total axial power, total tangential power, total mean power, and total optical power. Similar comparisons were made to Atlas curvature at the 0.0 to 10.0 mm zones.

Results

The mean corneal power after refractive surgery based on BCK values using the Holladay 2 formula (BCK H2) was 39.35 diopters (D) ± 2.58 (SD). The mean manual value (40.52 ± 1.95 D) and Atlas-based values were statistically higher than BCK H2 values (P<.001). The mean corneal power calculated from historical data was 39.33 ± 2.70 D (P = .83 to BCK H2; n = 19) and from contact lens overrefraction, 41.38 ± 3.11 D (P = .19; n = 5). Orbscan II parameters (n = 21) of the total mean power (3.0 mm, 39.10 ± 2.63 D), total tangential power (3.0 mm, 39.11 ± 2.60), total axial power (5.0 mm, 39.19 ± 2.55 D), and total optical power (3.0 mm, 39.08 ± 2.78 D; 4.0 mm, 39.39 ± 2.76 D) were statistically similar to both the historical and BCK H2 values (P>.11). If used prospectively, 80.9% of eyes would have been within ±0.50 D of the targeted refraction using a 4.0 mm total optical power, 76.2% using a 5.0 mm total axial power, and 42.1% using the historical method.

Conclusion

The Orbscan II 5.0 mm total axial power and 4.0 mm total optical power can be used to more accurately predict true corneal power than the history-based method and may be particularly useful when pre-LASIK data are unavailable.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by the Midwest Cornea Research Foundation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.Dr. Pepose received research and travel support from Bausch & Lomb. Dr. Roberts is a consultant to Bausch & Lomb. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(06)01118-7

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.026

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 21-30, January 2007