Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 31-36 (January 2007)


View previous. 23 of 53 View next.

No-history method of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

H. John Shammas, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Maya C. Shammas, MD

Accepted 29 August 2006.

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the no-history method for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in 15 cataractous eyes that had previous myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and for which the pre-LASIK K-readings were not available.

Setting

Private practice, Lynwood, California, USA.

Methods

The predicted IOL power was calculated in each case. Also calculated were the mean arithmetic and absolute IOL predictor errors, range of the prediction errors, and number of eyes in which the error was within ±1.00 diopter (D).

Results

The mean arithmetic IOL prediction error was −0.003 D ± 0.63 (SD), and the mean absolute IOL prediction error was 0.55 ± 0.31 D (range −0.89 to +1.05 D). Fourteen eyes (93.3%) were within ±1.00 D. The results of the Shammas post-LASIK formula compared favorably to the results obtained with the optimized Holladay 1 (P = .42), Hoffer Q (P = .25), Haigis (P = .30), and Holladay 2 (P = .19) formulas and were better than the results obtained with the optimized SRK/T formula (P = .0005).

Conclusion

The no-history method is a viable alternative for IOL power calculation after myopic LASIK when the refractive surgery data are not available.

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, The Keck School of Medicine (H.J. Shammas), Los Angeles, California, and the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University (M.C. Shammas), New York, New York, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: H. John Shammas, MD, 3510 M.L. King, Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood, California 90262, USA.

 Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(06)01221-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.045


View previous. 23 of 53 View next.