« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 301-304
, February 2007
Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: Vicryl versus Mersilene sutures
References
- . Corneal sutures: is routine removal really necessary?. Eye. 1994;8:339–342
- . Ocular morbidity due to monofilament nylon corneal sutures. Eye. 1991;5:106–112
- . Complications of exposed monofilament sutures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:515–519
- . Should nylon corneal sutures be routinely removed?. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:663–664
- . In situ degradation of 11/0 polyester (Mersilene) suture material following cataract surgery. Eye. 1994;8:676–679
- . Do Mersilene sutures need to be removed after cataract surgery?. Eye. 1996;10:555–557
- . A prospective controlled study of a 10/0 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification. Eye. 1998;12:399–402
- Natural history of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17:313–318
- . Timing of removal of sutures in control of post-operative astigmatism. Eye. 1993;7:143–147
- . Changes in astigmatism after congenital cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation; a comparative study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:695–697
- Cycloplegic refractions in infants and young children. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:239–247
- . Bacterial endophthalmitis after suture removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:725–727
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Supported by a grant from the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
PII: S0886-3350(06)01459-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.039
© 2007 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 301-304
, February 2007
