Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 359-360 , March 2007

Testing and reporting contrast sensitivity

References 

  1. Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés Micó R, et al. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1320–1327
  2. Padmanabhan P, Rao SK, Jayasree R, et al. Monochromatic aberrations in eyes with different intraocular lens optic designs. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:78–84
  3. Kasper T, Bühren J, Kohnen T. Intraindividual comparison of higher-order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses as a function of pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:78–84
  4. Marcos S, Barbero S, Jiménez-Alfaro I. Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:223–235
  5. Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:297–306
  6. Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:652–660
  7. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA. Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:692–696
  8. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:986–992
  9. Kennis H, Huygens M, Callebaut F. Comparing the contrast sensitivity of a modified prolate anterior surface IOL and of two spherical IOLs. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2004;294:49–58
  10. Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:712–717
  11. Kershner RM. Retinal image contrast and functional visual performance with aspheric, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses; prospective evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1684–1694
  12. Denoyer A, Roger F, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Qualité de vision des patients porteurs d'un implant asphérique prolate après chirurgie de la cataracte. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:157–163
  13. Martínez Palmer A, Palacín Miranda B, Castilla Céspedes M, et al. Influencia de la aberración esférica en la función visual tras cirugía de catarata: ensayo prospectivo aleatorio. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:71–77
  14. Ricci F, Scuderi G, Missiroli F, et al. Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:718–722
  15. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:703–711
  16. Nio Y-K, Jansonius NM, Geraghty E, et al. Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2073–2081
  17. Ginsburg AP. Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. In:  Rosenthal BP,  Cole RG editor. Functional Assessment of Low Vision. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1996;p. 77–88
  18. Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg. 1998;14:463–466

PII: S0886-3350(06)01587-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.061

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 359-360 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution