Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 791-795, May 2007

Primary piggyback implantation using the ReSTOR intraocular lens: Case series

From the Brasilia Ophthalmologic Hospital, Brasilia, Brazil

Accepted 25 January 2007.

Purpose

To assess the postoperative outcomes of piggyback implantation using the AcrySof ReSTOR intraocular lens (IOL) (model SA60D3, Alcon Surgical Laboratories).

Setting

Hospital Oftalmológico de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Methods

Thirteen eyes of 7 patients who had phacoemulsification with piggyback IOL implantation were analyzed prospectively. In all cases, a ReSTOR IOL was implanted in the capsular bag and a second silicone IOL was implanted in the ciliary sulcus. Information collected included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at near and distance, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and spherical equivalent (SE) before and after surgery.

Results

The patients were followed for 12 months. The mean distance UCVA was 0.25 (20/80) preoperatively and 0.88 (20/23) at the last follow-up (1 year), which was significantly better than before surgery (P<.05). The mean SE was +4.25 diopters (D) ± 1.5 (SD) preoperatively and +0.15 ± 0.44 D (range −0.50 to +0.75 D) at 1 year, which was significantly better than preoperatively (P<.05). No patient lost lines of BCVA after surgery. At the last follow-up, all eyes had a near UCVA of J1 and none required spectacles for near or distance vision.

Conclusion

Piggyback implantation using the ReSTOR IOL appeared to be a safe and efficient procedure providing high-quality visual acuity for near and distance vision in selected patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(07)00164-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.016

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 791-795, May 2007