Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 1045-1050, June 2007

Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: Estimating the refractive corneal power

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Awwad, Dwarakanathan, Bowman, Cavanagh, Verity, Mootha, McCulley), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (Awwad), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

Accepted 2 March 2007.

Purpose

To evaluate the most accurate method for corneal power determination in patients with previous radial keratotomy (RK).

Setting

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Methods

A retrospective review of data for 16 eyes of 14 patients with a history of RK and subsequent phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was performed. Outcome measures included axial length, postoperative topography, type and power of IOL implanted, and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction at 3 to 6 months. Average central corneal power (ACCP) was defined as the average of the mean powers of the central Placido rings. For each eye, simulated K-readings and different values of ACCP computed corresponding to different central corneal diameters were used in each case, along with the implanted IOL power, to back-calculate the SE refraction (Ref) via the double-K adjusted Holladay 1 IOL formula. The predicted refractive error was hence computed as (Ref – SE), both in algebraic and absolute values.

Results

The ACCP over the central 3.0 mm (ACCP3mm) yielded the lowest absolute predicted refractive error (0.25 ± 0.38 diopters [D]), which was statistically lower than the error for ACCP1mm (P<.001) and for the simulated K-value (P = .033). It also resulted in 87.5% of eyes being within ±0.50 D and 100% within ±1.00 D of the actual postoperative refraction.

Conclusions

Corneal refractive power after RK was best described by averaging the topographic data of the central 3.0 mm area. Applying this method, together with a double-K IOL formula, achieved excellent IOL power predictability.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 James. P. McCulley, MD is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York, USA.

PII: S0886-3350(07)00457-9

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.018

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 1045-1050, June 2007