Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1209-1216, July 2007
Phacoviscocanalostomy versus cataract surgery only in patients with coexisting normal-tension glaucoma: Midterm outcomes
Purpose
To compare the midterm efficacy and safety of phacoviscocanalostomy (viscocanalostomy, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens [IOL] implantation) and cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and IOL implantation) in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and cataract.
Setting
Sensho-kai Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan.
Methods
Thirty-one eyes had phacoviscocanalostomy, and 35 eyes had uncomplicated cataract surgery only. The intraocular pressure (IOP), postoperative antiglaucoma medications, and visual outcomes were compared between groups.
Results
The mean follow-up was 34.9 months ± 19.8 (SD) (range 7 to 78 months). At 36 months, the mean preoperative IOP and postoperative IOP were 17.2 ± 1.5 mm Hg and 14.1 ± 1.6 mm Hg, respectively, in the phacoviscocanalostomy group and 16.7 ± 1.4 mm Hg and 15.6 ± 3.4 mm Hg, respectively, in the cataract surgery only group. The differences between groups were significant at all time points (P<.05). The success probabilities of the phacoviscocanalostomy group achieving 20% and 30% IOP reductions with (or without) medications were 78.5% (67.4%) and 35.5% (37.4%) at 24 months and 58.0% (44.2%) and 28.0% (26.6%) at 48 months, which were significantly better than the probabilities in the cataract surgery only group, which were 16.0% (9.5%) and 5.7% (2.9%) at 24 months (P<.001 for each comparison, Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis with log-rank test). Based on the modified Aulhorn-Greve classification, the visual acuity and visual fields did not deteriorate in the phacoviscocanalostomy group; the visual fields deteriorated in 6 eyes in the cataract surgery only group during the follow-up (P = .024).
Conclusion
Phacoviscocanalostomy lowered IOP and maintained postoperative visual outcomes; it was safe and effective in elderly patients with coexisting NTG and cataract.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PII: S0886-3350(07)00582-2
doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.027
© 2007 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1209-1216, July 2007
