Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 1177-1182 (July 2007)


View previous. 21 of 51 View next.

Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

Thomas Ho, MRCOphth, Arthur C.K. Cheng, MCRS, FCOphth(HK)Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Srinivas K. Rao, FRCS, Silvania Lau, Chris K.S. Leung, MRCS, Dennis S.C. Lam, FRCS, FRCOphth

Accepted 12 March 2007.

Purpose

To compare corneal pachymetry assessment using 4 measurement methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.

Methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients (103 eyes) who had LASIK for the correction of myopia had Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb), Visante (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonomed, 200P) 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression.

Results

The mean postoperative pachymetry measured by US, Orbscan (0.89 acoustic factor), Pentacam, and Visante pachymetry were 438.2 μm ± 41.18 (SD), 435.17 ± 49.63 μm, 430.66 ± 40.23 μm, and 426.56 ± 41.6 μm, respectively. Compared with the US measurement, Pentacam and Visante measurements significantly underestimated corneal thickness by a mean of 7.54 ± 15.06 μm (P<.01) and 11.64 ± 12.87 μm (P<.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between US and Orbscan measurements.

Conclusion

Pentacam and Visante measurements of corneal thickness 6 months after LASIK were significantly less than those obtained using Orbscan and US pachymetry, although all 4 measurement methods showed a high correlation with each other.

From the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, University Eye Center, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Arthur Cheng, Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, University Eye Center, 3/F., Hong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Supported in part by the Action for Vision Eye Foundation, Hong Kong, China.

PII: S0886-3350(07)00583-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028


View previous. 21 of 51 View next.