Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1177-1182, July 2007

Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

From the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, University Eye Center, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Accepted 12 March 2007.

Purpose

To compare corneal pachymetry assessment using 4 measurement methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.

Methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients (103 eyes) who had LASIK for the correction of myopia had Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb), Visante (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonomed, 200P) 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression.

Results

The mean postoperative pachymetry measured by US, Orbscan (0.89 acoustic factor), Pentacam, and Visante pachymetry were 438.2 μm ± 41.18 (SD), 435.17 ± 49.63 μm, 430.66 ± 40.23 μm, and 426.56 ± 41.6 μm, respectively. Compared with the US measurement, Pentacam and Visante measurements significantly underestimated corneal thickness by a mean of 7.54 ± 15.06 μm (P<.01) and 11.64 ± 12.87 μm (P<.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between US and Orbscan measurements.

Conclusion

Pentacam and Visante measurements of corneal thickness 6 months after LASIK were significantly less than those obtained using Orbscan and US pachymetry, although all 4 measurement methods showed a high correlation with each other.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Supported in part by the Action for Vision Eye Foundation, Hong Kong, China.

PII: S0886-3350(07)00583-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1177-1182, July 2007