Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1158-1176 , July 2007

Retrospective comparison of 3 laser platforms to correct myopic spheres and spherocylinders using conventional and wavefront-guided treatments

  • Perry S. Binder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr. Perry S. Binder, 8910 University Center Lane, Suite 800, San Diego, California 92122, USA.
    • ,
  • Joseph Rosenshein, PhD

References 

  1. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46–52
  2. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:201–207
  3. Applegate RA. Limits to vision: can we do better than nature?. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S547–S551
  4. Klyce SD, Karon MD, Smolek ML. Advantages and disadvantages of the Zernike expansion for representing wave aberration of the normal and aberrated eye. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S537–S541
  5. Kawesch GM, Kezirian GM. Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia with the VISX Star laser. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:653–661
  6. McDonald MB, Carr JM, Frantz JM, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia up to −11 diopters with up to −5 diopters of astigmatism with the Summit Autonomous LADARVision excimer laser system. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:309–316
  7. Flanagan GW, Binder PS. Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:113–123
  8. Jabbur NS, Kraff C. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6-month results in 277 eyes; the Visx Wavefront Study Group. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1493–1501
  9. Brint SF. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and WaveLight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S799–S803
  10. Binder PS. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:26–32
  11. Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in suit keratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:962–969
  12. Koller T, Iseli HP, Hafezi F, et al. Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:584–589
  13. Flanagan G, Binder PS. Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1674–1683
  14. Woolson RF, Clarke WR. Comparing more than two groups of observations; analysis of variance for comparing groups. In:  Woolson RF,  Clarke WR editor. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002;chapt 10
  15. Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS. Analysing non-normal data. In:  Armitage P,  Berry G,  Matthews JNS editor. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2002;chapt 10
  16. Woolson RF, Clarke WR. Comparing more than two groups of observations; rank analysis of variance for group comparisons. In:  Woolson RF,  Clarke WR editor. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002;chapt 11
  17. Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977;
  18. Warden L, Binder PS, Dreher A, Sverdrup L. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor. In press, J Cataract Refract Surg
  19. Kezirian GM, Drum B, Eydelman M. Systematic evaluation of wavefront-guided outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1306–1313
  20. Phusitphoykai N, Tungsiripat T, Siriboonkoom J, Vongthongsri A. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S217–S220
  21. Kim T-I, Yang S-J, Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:432–438
  22. Twa MD, Lembach RG, Bullimore MA, Roberts C. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:173–183
  23. Slade S. Contralateral comparison of Alcon CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: one month results. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S601–S605
  24. Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes; potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:97–105
  25. Netto MV, Ambrósio R, Shen TT, Wilson SE. Wavefront analysis in normal refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:332–338
  26. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1487–1495

 Dr. Binder is a paid consultant to IntraLase, Corp. The other author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(07)00649-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.040

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 1158-1176 , July 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution