Outcomes of radiofrequency in advanced keratoconus
Accepted 22 March 2007.
Refers to erratum:
Erratum
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
October 2007 (Vol. 33, Issue 10, Page 1679) Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (66 KB)
Purpose
To evaluate the use of radiofrequency energy to correct advanced keratoconus.
Setting
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, and Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.
Methods
In this prospective comparative study, radiofrequency was applied to 25 eyes of 21 consecutive patients. One group comprised patients with a K-reading between 54.0 diopters (D) and 58.0 D; 8 thermal spots were placed at the 4.0 mm optical zone. The other group comprised patients with a K-reading greater than 58.0 D; 16 spots were applied at the 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm optical zones. The minimum follow-up was 18 months in all patients. Differences between preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and K-readings were clinically and statistically evaluated.
Results
At end of the 18-month follow-up, the mean BSCVA in the 8-spot group improved from 20/100 (0.71 ± 0.25 logMAR) preoperatively to 20/40 (0.32 ± 0.11 logMAR) and in the 16-spot group, from 20/200 (1.03 ± 0.30 logMAR) to 20/60 (0.62 ± 0.22 logMAR). The mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) improved from −7.70 D ± 5.20 (SD) preoperatively to −6.82 ± 4.41 D after 18 months in the 8-spot group and from −11.33 ± 6.70 to −8.38 ± 5.12 D, respectively, in the 16-spot group. The mean best contact lens–corrected visual acuity was 20/30 (0.18 ± 0.24 logMAR) in the 8-spot group and 20/40 (0.31 ± 0.19 logMAR) in the 16-spot group. A dense corneal scar was seen in 1 patient in the 16-spot group at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions
Radiofrequency appeared safe for the treatment of advanced keratoconus. Contact lens fitting was stable in all cases.
From the Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas (J.M. Lyra, D. Lyra, Bezerra), Maceió, and Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Trindade), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Corresponding author: João Marcelo Lyra, MD, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Rua Des. Tenório 80, Farol, Maceió - AL 57050050, Brazil.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
ABSTRACT