Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 9 , Pages 1522-1529, September 2007

Effects of misalignment during corneal topography

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Hick), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; the Departments of Ophthalmology (Hick, Laliberté, Meunier, Brunette), Computer Sciences and Operations Research (Meunier), and Mathematics and Statistics (Chagnon), University of Montreal, and Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital (Laliberté, Brunette), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Accepted 7 May 2007.

Purpose

To evaluate consequences of misalignment during corneal topography.

Setting

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Methods

Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in a study of 2 types of misalignment during Orbscan topography acquisition. The first was rotation, which was defined as angular deviation of the subject's visual axis away from the central fixation target, and the second was translation, defined as off-center displacement of the joined half slits on the computer screen during alignment by the technician. The effect of vertical and horizontal misalignments, by rotation or translation, was assessed. Study parameters included simulated keratometries (SimKs), mean corneal power (mean power), and corneal apex (R) and the asphericity factor (Q) values. Inferior–superior (I–S) and temporal–nasal (T–N) indices were calculated. Differences in parameter values between aligned and misaligned positions were studied. A mathematical model was also developed to simulate rotational and translational misalignment and consolidate clinical experimentation.

Results

The mean SimK values were slightly but significantly affected by rotation. The I–S value increased significantly with downward rotation and decreased with upward rotation of the eye, while T–N values increased significantly with temporal rotation and decreased with nasal rotation. The R and Q values increased with rotation. Overall, the topography parameters were minimally affected by translation. Comparable results were obtained with the theoretical model.

Conclusions

Rotational misalignment of the eye during acquisition influenced topography more than the translational misalignment during focusing by the technician. Rotational misalignment induced corneal asymmetry on elevation and curvature maps as well as pseudokeratoconus patterns.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Supported by the FRSQ Research in Vision Network, Montreal, Quebec, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction, the Léon-Frédéricq Foundation, University of Liège, Belgium; and a mandate for clinical research, CHU Liège, Belgium; Le Fonds Besner-Valois and Le Fonds de recherche en ophtalmologie de l'Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Presented at the World Cornea Congress V and ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Washington, DC, USA, April 2005.

PII: S0886-3350(07)01067-X

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.029

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 9 , Pages 1522-1529, September 2007