Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children: Outcomes at 1 year
Accepted 12 July 2007.
Purpose
To assess the refractive, visual acuity, and binocular results of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for anisomyopia, anisohyperopia, and anisoastigmatia in children with various levels of amblyopia secondary to the anisometropic causes.
Setting
Nonhospital surgical facility with follow-up in a hospital clinic setting.
Methods
This retrospective review was of 53 children with anisometropia who had LASEK to correct the refractive difference between eyes. All LASEK procedures were performed using general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their anisometropia as follows: myopic difference greater than 3.00 diopters (D), astigmatic difference greater than 1.50 D, and hyperopic difference greater than 3.50 D. The children were followed for at least 1 year, and their refractive status, visual acuity, and binocular vision were assessed and recorded at 2 and 6 months as well as 1 year.
Results
The mean age at treatment was 8.4 years (range 10 months to 16 years). The mean preoperative anisometropic difference was 6.98 D in the entire group, 9.48 D in the anisomyopic group, 3.13 D in the anisoastigmatic group, and 5.50 D in the anisohyperopic group. One year after LASEK, the mean anisometropic difference decreased to 1.81 D, 2.43 D, 0.74 D, and 2.33 D, respectively, and 54% of all eyes were within ±1.00 D of the fellow eye, 68% were within ±2.00 D, and 80% were within ±3.00 D. Preoperative visual acuity and binocular vision could be measured in 33 children. Postoperatively, 63.6% of children had an improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the remainder had no noted change. No patient had a reduction in BCVA or a loss in fusional ability after LASEK. Of the 33 children, 39.4% had positive stereopsis preoperatively and 87.9% had positive stereopsis 1 year after LASEK.
Conclusion
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy is an effective surgical alternative to improve visual acuity in anisometropic children unable to tolerate conventional methods of treatment or in whom these methods fail.
From Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Corresponding author: William F. Astle, MD, FRCSC, Vision Clinic, Alberta Children's Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
ABSTRACT