Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 95-102, January 2008

Anterior segment biometry with 2 imaging technologies: Very-high-frequency ultrasound scanning versus optical coherence tomography

From the Vissum/Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante (Piñero, Plaza, Alió), and the Division of Ophthalmology (Alio), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain

Accepted 27 August 2007.

Purpose

To determine the interchangeability of 2 anterior segment imaging systems: a very-high-frequency (VHF) ultrasound scanning system (Artemis 2, Ultralink LLC) and an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system (Visante, Zeiss).

Setting

Vissum Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Methods

This study comprised 20 eyes without pathology or previous surgery. The anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), angle-to-angle distance (ATA), and the iridocorneal angle size (IAS) at the 0-degree and 180-degree positions were measured with 2 imaging techniques: VHF ultrasound scanning and OCT. Analysis of agreement and interchangeability was performed by the Bland and Altman method. In addition, each measurement was performed 3 times consecutively to determine intrasession repeatability by means of the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between imaging techniques in ACD, CCT, or ATA (P>.40). The ranges of agreement were 0.20 mm, 16.11 μm, and 0.80 mm for ACD, CCT, and ATA, respectively. Regarding IAS, no statistically significant differences were found in the nasal (P = .78) or temporal (P = .63) measurements between devices. However, the range of agreement for nasal (14.3 degrees) and temporal (14.90 degrees) values was relevant, indicating the 2 techniques cannot be used interchangeably for IAS measurement. Excellent intrasession repeatability scores were obtained (CV and ICC).

Conclusion

The Artemis 2 and the Visante OCT systems provide equivalent and repeatable measurements of the ACD, CCT, and ATA and can be used interchangeably for these purposes.

 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Health, Red Temática de Investigación en Oftalmología, Subproyecto de Cirugía Refractiva y Calidad Visual (C03/13), and Spanish Generalitat Valenciana (ref: Grupos05/036) Grants and Support for Scientific Research and Technological Development in the Comunidad Valenciana for the year 2005.

PII: S0886-3350(07)01770-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.08.033

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 95-102, January 2008