Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 774-784 , May 2008

Objective accommodation measurements in prepresbyopic eyes using an autorefractor and an aberrometer

  • Dorothy M. Win-Hall, OD
    • ,
  • Adrian Glasser, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Adrian Glasser, PhD, University of Houston, College of Optometry, 505 J. Davis Armistead Building, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.

,Accepted 21 December 2007.

References 

  1. Keeney AH, Hagman RE, Fratello CJ. Dictionary of Ophthalmic Optics. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995;4
  2. Millodot M. Dictionary of Optometry and Vision Science. 4th ed.. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997;3
  3. Atchison DA. Accommodation and presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:255–272
  4. Duane A. Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. J Am Med Assoc. 1912;59:1010–1013
  5. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res. 1998;38:209–229
  6. Koretz JF, Kaufman PL, Neider MW, Goeckner PA. Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye—aging of the anterior segment. Vision Res. 1989;29:1685–1692
  7. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1435–1444
  8. Hamasaki D, Ong J, Marg E. The amplitude of accommodation in presbyopia. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1956;33:3–14
  9. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vision Res. 1999;39:1991–2015
  10. Heys KR, Cram SL, Truscott RJW. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia?. Mol Vis. 2004;10:956–963Available at: http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v10/a114Accessed January 23, 2008
  11. Weeber HA, Eckert G, Soergel F, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:425–434
  12. Weeber HA, Eckert G, Pechhold W, van der Heijde RGL. Stiffness gradient in the crystalline lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1357–1366
  13. Koopmans SA, Terwee T, Barkhof J, et al. Polymer refilling of presbyopic human lenses in vitro restores the ability to undergo accommodative changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:250–257Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/44/1/250Accessed January 23, 2008
  14. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307–1312
  15. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses; the Erlangen Accommodative Intraocular Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:318–324
  16. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Naroo S, et al. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1230–1235Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/47/3/1230Accessed January 23, 2008
  17. Findl O. Intraocular lenses for restoring accommodation: hope and reality. [editorial] J Refract Surg. 2005;21:321–323
  18. Ben-nun J, Alió JL. Feasibility and development of a high-power real accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1802–1808
  19. Wirbelauer C, Karandish A, Aurich H, Pham DT. Imaging scleral expansion bands for presbyopia with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2435–2438
  20. Hamilton DR, Davidorf JM, Maloney RK. Anterior ciliary sclerotomy for treatment of presbyopia: a prospective controlled study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1970–1976discussion by RF Steinert, 1976–1977
  21. Qazi MA, Pepose JS, Shuster JJ. Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:808–815
  22. Malecaze FJ, Gazagne CS, Tarroux MC, Gorrand J-M. Scleral expansion bands for presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2165–2171
  23. Koeppl C, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1290–1297
  24. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2005–2009discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
  25. Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1679–1684
  26. Claoué C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation; prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2088–2091
  27. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK, et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:693–696
  28. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:895–902
  29. Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685
  30. Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Evaluation of a satisfied bilateral scleral expansion band patient. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1445–1453
  31. Ostrin L, Kasthurirangan S, Win-Hall D, Glasser A. Simultaneous measurements of refraction and A-scan biometry during accommodation in humans. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:657–665
  32. Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:879–887
  33. Wolffsohn JS, Ukai K, Gilmartin B. Dynamic measurement of accommodation and pupil size using the portable Grand Seiko FR-5000 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:306–310
  34. Pallikaris IG, Panagopoulou SI, Molebny VV. Clinical experience with the Tracey technology wavefront device. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S588–S591
  35. Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DEM, Tassignon M-J. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers. Part 1: technical specifications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1114–1127
  36. Moreno-Barriuso E, Navarro R. Laser ray tracing versus Hartmann-Shack sensor for measuring optical aberrations in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000;17:974–985
  37. Wang L, Wang N, Koch DD. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the WaveScan WaveFront system and the Tracey wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:970–979
  38. Pallikaris LG, Panagopoulou SI, Siganos CS, Molebny VV. Objective measurement of wavefront aberrations with and without accommodation. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S602–S607
  39. Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis. 2005;5:466–477Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/5/5/7/Accessed January 23, 2008
  40. Johnson CA. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J Opt Soc Am. 1976;66:138–142
  41. Charman WN, Walsh G. Variations in the local refractive correction of the eye across its entrance pupil. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:34–40
  42. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  43. Cheng H, Barnett JK, Vilupuru AS, et al. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004;4:272–280Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/4/4/3/Accessed January 23, 2008
  44. Vilupuru AS, Roorda A, Glasser A. Spatially variant changes in lens power during ocular accommodation in a rhesus monkey eye. J Vis. 2004;4:299–309Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/4/4/6/Accessed January 23, 2008
  45. Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1878–1888
  46. Koeppl C, Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Drexler W. Comparison of pilocarpine-induced and stimulus-driven accommodation in phakic eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:795–800

 Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, May 2005.

 Funded in part by NIH Loan Repayment Program (Dr. Win-Hall) and a grant from Eyeonics, Inc., Aliso Viejo, California, USA (Dr. Glasser).

 Mark Dehn and AIT Industries, Inc., provided the WR-5100K autorefractor.

PII: S0886-3350(08)00125-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.033

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 774-784 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution