Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 1228-1229 , August 2008

Reply: Consent for cataract surgery: A patient perspective

References 

  1. Kiss CG, Richter-Mueksch S, Stifter E, Diendorfer-Radner G, Velikay-Parel M, Radner E. Informed consent and decision making by cataract patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:94–98
  2. Fernando B, Bhojwani R, Skarmoustas P, Aralikatti D, Mohan M. Standards in consent for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1464–1468
  3. Scott RW. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 3rd ed.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1992;
  4. Pendleton D, King J. Values and leadership. BMJ. 2002;325:1352–1355
  5. Department of Health . Implementation guide in: Good practice in consent. Consent for examination, treatment or care. London, UK: Department of Health; 2003;Available at http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/consent-guidepart1.pdfAccessed May 20, 2008
  6. Department of Health . Good practice in consent implementation guide: consent to examination or treatment. London, UK: Department of Health; 2001;55. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4005762Accessed May 20, 2008
  7. Kress G. Literacy in the New Media Age. London, UK: Routledge; 2003;
  8. Beane E, Wolstencroft H. Visual Approaches to Teaching Writing; Multimodal Literacy 5 – 11. London, UK: Paul Chapman; 2007;

PII: S0886-3350(08)00532-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.021

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 1228-1229 , August 2008