Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 12 , Pages 2024-2029 , December 2008

Dynamic stimulation of accommodation

,Accepted 15 July 2008.

References 

  1. Helmholtz H. Ueber die Accommodation des Auges. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1855;1(2):1–74
  2. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:863–872
  3. Schachar RA, Cudmore DP, Torti R, Black TD, Huang T. A physical model demonstrating Schachar's hypothesis of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1994;26:4–9
  4. Auffarth GU, Martin M, Fuchs HA, Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Schmack I. Validität der Vorderkammertiefenmessung zur Akkommodations-evaluierung nach Implantation einer akkommodativen Intraokularlinse (Modell Humanoptics 1CU). [Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens.]. Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:815–819
  5. Ossma IL, Galvis A, Vargas LG, Trager MJ, Vagefi MR, McLeod SD. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:47–52
  6. Koeppl C, Findl O, Menapace R, Kriechbaum K, Wirtitsch M, Buehl W, et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1290–1297
  7. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:453–459
  8. Schneider H, Stachs O, Göbel K, Guthoff R. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:322–329
  9. Ostrin L, Kasthurirangan S, Win-Hall D, Glasser A. Simultaneous measurements of refraction and A-scan biometry during accommodation in humans. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:657–665
  10. Bolz M, Prinz A, Drexler W, Findl O. Linear relationship of refractive and biometric lenticular changes during accommodation in emmetropic and myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:360–365
  11. Nemeth G, Tsorbatzoglou A, Vamosi P, Sohajda Z, Berta A. A comparison of accommodation amplitudes in pseudophakic eyes measured with three different methods. Eye. 2008;22:65–69
  12. Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses; pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2476–2482
  13. Plainis S, Ginis HS. Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis. 2005;5:466–477Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/5/5/7/Accessed August 18, 2008
  14. Yang Y, Wu F. Technical note: comparison of the wavefront aberrations between natural and pharmacological pupil dilations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:220–223
  15. Nishi T, Nawa Y, Ueda T, Masuda K, Taketani F, Hara Y. Effect of total higher-order aberrations on accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1643–1649
  16. Marcos S, Rosales P, Llorente L, Barbero S, Jiménez-Alfaro I. Balance of corneal horizontal coma by internal optics in eyes with intraocular artificial lenses: evidence of a passive mechanism. Vision Res. 2008;48:70–79
  17. Rosales P, Wendt M, Marcos S, Glasser A. Changes in crystalline lens radii of curvature and lens tilt and decentration during dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. J Vis. 2008;8:18.1–12. Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/8/1/18/Accessed August 18, 2008
  18. Schachar RA, Davila C, Pierscionek BK, Chen W, Ward WW. The effect of human in vivo accommodation on crystalline lens stability. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:790–793
  19. Schachar RA, Koivula A. The stress on the anterior lens surface during human in vivo accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:348–350
  20. Tsorbatzoglou A, Németh G, Máth J, Berta A. Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1345–1350
  21. Uthoff D, Gulati A, Hepper D, Holland D. Potentially accommodating 1CU intraocular lens: 1-year results in 553 eyes and literature review. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:159–171
  22. López-Gil N, Fernández-Sánchez V, Legras R, Montés-Micó R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1736–1743Available at: http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/49/4/1736Accessed August 18, 2008
  23. Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN. Age-related changes in ocular aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2007;7(7):11.1–21. Available at: http://www.journalofvision.org/7/7/11/Accessed August 18, 2008

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Presented at the ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA, April 2008.

 Supported in part by the Klaus Tschira Foundation GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

 Miriam Casper, MSW, helped to prepare the manuscript.

PII: S0886-3350(08)00946-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.034

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 34, Issue 12 , Pages 2024-2029 , December 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution