Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 113-120, January 2009

Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography

From the Vissum-Instituto de Oftalmológico de Alicante (Piñero, Saenz González, Alió), and Departamento de Óptica (Piñero), Farmacología y Anatomía, Universidad de Alicante, and the Division of Ophthalmology (Alió), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain

Received 17 June 2008; received in revised form 29 September 2008; accepted 2 October 2008.

Purpose

To assess the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface provided by a Scheimpflug photography system in normal eyes.

Setting

Vissum-Instituto de Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Methods

All eyes received a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including corneal topographic analysis with a Scheimpflug photography system (Pentacam). Three repeated consecutive measurements were taken by 2 independent experienced examiners to assess intraobserver and interobserver repeatability for posterior corneal surface measurements. Keratometry, astigmatism, best-fit sphere (BFS), asphericity (Q), and aberrometry (6.0 mm pupil diameter) were analyzed. Precision, repeatability, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for evaluating intraobserver repeatability. Bland-Altman analysis was used for assessing interobserver repeatability.

Results

Twenty eyes (20 patients) were included. Patients ranged in age from 21 to 50 years. The best intraobserver precision values were for BFS and Q in the central 8.0 mm (0.037 mm and 0.05, respectively). For both observers, intraobserver precision and repeatability achieved an acceptable level for keratometric readings (precision <0.09 diopter). The most limited intraobserver precision was for Q in the central 6.0 mm (0.117 observer 1; 0.099 observer 2). Interobserver ranges of agreement were not clinically relevant for any parameter except Q in the central 6.0 mm (0.116). Regarding aberrometry, intraobserver repeatability and interobserver repeatability were acceptable only for primary and secondary spherical aberration.

Conclusion

The Pentacam system provided reliable measurements of corneal posterior keratometry, astigmatism, and asphericity for large diameters of analysis. However, poor repeatability was observed for aberrometric measurements.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto Carlos III, Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud Patología Ocular del Envejecimiento, Calidad Visual y Calidad de Vida, Subproyecto de Calidad Visual (RD07/0062)

PII: S0886-3350(08)00983-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.010

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 113-120, January 2009