Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 105-112 (January 2009)


View previous. 30 of 47 View next.

Excimer laser–assisted lamellar keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of keratoconus

Leopoldo Spadea, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Daniele Giammaria, MD, Arianna Fiasca, MD, Valerio Verrecchia, MD

Received 2 June 2008; received in revised form 30 September 2008; accepted 2 October 2008.

Purpose

To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of excimer laser–assisted lamellar keratoplasty (ELLK) in keratoconus patients.

Setting

Eye Clinic, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Methods

This prospective case series comprised patients with keratoconus who had ELLK and were examined preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, computerized videokeratography, pachymetry, and endothelial specular microscopy.

Results

Forty-one eyes (41 patients) were examined. The UCVA and BSCVA were significantly better at all follow-up examinations than preoperatively. After the 24-month follow-up (33 patients), the UCVA was better than 20/60 in 11 patients (33.3%) and the BSCVA was 20/40 or better in 29 patients (87.9%). The mean refractive astigmatism was 2.20 diopters (D) and the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent refraction, −1.18 D. Corneal topographic patterns were regularly astigmatic in 28 (84.8%) of 33 eyes, and the mean corneal thickness (440.0 μm) was significantly greater than preoperatively (553.0 μm). No statistically significant changes in mean corneal endothelial cell density were observed postoperatively. Complications included corneal melting treated with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) (1 case) and postoperative high refractive error requiring topographically guided excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (7 cases).

Conclusions

Two-year findings indicate that ELLK is as efficacious as PKP for the surgical treatment of moderate to advanced keratoconus. The procedure is relatively simple. Most steps can be standardized, and there are no time-consuming maneuvers.

From the University of L'Aquila, Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, L'Aquila, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Leopoldo Spadea, MD, Via Benozzo Gozzoli 34, 00142 Rome, Italy.

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

 Supported by the Department of Surgical Sciences, University of L'Aquila.

PII: S0886-3350(08)00995-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.013


View previous. 30 of 47 View next.