« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 2
, Pages 233-239
, February 2009
Postoperative corneal shape changes: Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery
References
- . Induced astigmatism in small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15:85–88
- . Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery; a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison of 4- and 6.5-mm incisions. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:417–423discussion by DD Koch, 423–424; correction 1997; 104:1370
- . Effect of cataract wound incision size on acute changes in corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:170–177
- . The correlation between incision size and corneal shape changes in sutureless cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:550–556
- . Prospective randomized comparison of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with a 3.2-mm vs a 5.5-mm sutureless incision. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:612–620
- . Comparative study of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2- and 5.5-mm incisions. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1183–1190
- . Phakonit: phacoemulsification through 0.9 mm corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1548–1552
- . Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:934–940
- . Ultrasonic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:81–86
- . Microphacoemulsification with WhiteStar; a wound-temperature study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1044–1046
- . Efficacy and wound-temperature gradient of WhiteStar phacoemulsification through a 1.2 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1097–1100
- . Feasibility of sleeveless bimanual phacoemulsification with the Millennium microsurgical system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2199–2203
- . Optimizing refractive lens exchange with bimanual microincision phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:550–554
- . Clinical experience with 21-gauge manual microphacoemulsification using Sovereign WhiteStar technology in eyes with dense cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:168–172
- . Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:387–392
- . Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification; observational study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1019–1024
- . Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:284–288
- . Incision sizes before and after implantation of SN60WF intraocular lenses using the Monarch injector system with C and D cartridges. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1748–1753
- . Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1997–2003
- . Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1818–1826
- . Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:S1079–S1082
- . Corneal aberrations after microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:40–45
- . Clear corneal paracentesis: a case of chronic wound leakage in a patient having bimanual phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1075
- . Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification; evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:510–515
- . Endophthalmitis after microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1834–1835
- . Thermal study of bare tips with various system parameters and incision sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:867–872
- . Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:558–565
- . Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1549–1556
- . Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1557–1560
- . Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:318–323
- . Microincision bimanual phacoemulsification and Thinoptx® implantation through a 1.70 mm incision. Eye. 2007;21:177–182
- . Performance of the Acri. Smart 46S intraocular lens in pediatric microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:591–595
- . Prevention of anterior capsule contraction by anterior capsule relaxing incisions with neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:23–30
- . The pathophysiology of corneal astigmatism after cataract extraction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79:OP615–OP630
- . Fourier analysis of irregular astigmatism after implantation of 3 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1510–1516
- . Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1351–1354
- . Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:618–622
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PII: S0886-3350(08)01062-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.031
© 2009 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 2
, Pages 233-239
, February 2009
