Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 637-642, April 2009

Prophylactic intracameral cefazolin after cataract surgery:

Endophthalmitis risk reduction and safety results in a 6-year study

From the Ophthalmology Department (Garat, Moser, Martín-Baranera), Unit of Clinical Epidemiology (Alonso-Tarrés), and Unit of Microbiology (Álvarez-Rubio), Hospital Pharmacy Department, Hospital General de L'Hospitalet, Consorci Sanitari Integral, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Received 1 October 2008; received in revised form 23 December 2008; accepted 23 December 2008.

Purpose

To assess the use of intracameral cefazolin in preventing endophthalmitis in cataract surgery.

Setting

Ophthalmology Department, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Methods

This study was of phacoemulsification procedures performed from January 2002 to December 2007. In January 2004, intracameral cefazolin given at the end of the surgery was added to the prophylaxis protocol of cataract surgery. The cumulative incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis before and after the addition of intracameral cefazolin was compared.

Results

During the study period, 18579 phacoemulsification procedures were performed. In the 2-year period before introduction of intracameral cefazolin prophylaxis, 25 cases of endophthalmitis were diagnosed in 5930 surgeries, leading to a cumulative incidence of 0.422% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.279%-0.613%). After the introduction of cefazolin, 6 cases of endophthalmitis were diagnosed in 12649 surgeries, an incidence of 0.047% (95% CI, 0.019%-0.099%). When only microbiologically proven cases were considered, the cumulative endophthalmitis incidence was 0.388% (95% CI, 0.252%-0.572%) in the first study period and 0.032% (95% CI, 0.010%-0.076%) in the second study period (P<.0000001). The relative risk for presenting with endophthalmitis in the first study period compared with the second period was 8.89 (95% CI, 3.65-21.65).

Conclusions

A 2.5 mg/0.1 mL intracameral bolus of cefazolin provided excellent prophylactic effectiveness, with a reduction in the incidence of endophthalmitis from 0.422% to 0.047%, corresponding to a relative risk reduction of 88.7% (95% CI, 72.6%-95.4%). Cefazolin fulfills international recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical site infections and is easier to obtain in developing countries.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PII: S0886-3350(09)00068-6

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.023

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 637-642, April 2009